Golf balls having silicone foam center

ABSTRACT

Multi-piece golf balls having a solid core made of a foamed silicone composition and a cover are provided. For example, three-piece, four-piece, and five-piece golf balls containing different core structures can be made. Preferably, a dual-core having has a silicone foam inner core (center) and surrounding silicone foam outer core layer is made. The core layers can have different hardness gradients. The silicone foam center and outer core layer have good thermal stability and durability and provide the ball with good resiliency.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of co-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/071,819 filed Nov. 5, 2013, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,375,612 with an issue date of Jun. 28, 2016, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to multi-piece, golf balls having a solid core made of a foamed composition. Particularly, the dual-layered core has a foam inner core (center) and surrounding thermoset or thermoplastic outer core layer. Preferably, a silicone foam composition is used to form the foam center. The core layers have different hardness gradients and specific gravity values. The ball further includes a cover of at least one layer.

Brief Review of the Related Art

Both professional and amateur golfer use multi-piece, solid golf balls today. Basically, a two-piece solid golf ball includes a solid inner core protected by an outer cover. The inner core is made of a natural or synthetic rubber such as polybutadiene, styrene butadiene, or polyisoprene. The cover surrounds the inner core and may be made of a variety of materials including ethylene acid copolymer ionomers, polyamides, polyesters, polyurethanes, and polyureas.

In recent years, three-piece, four-piece, and even five-piece balls have become more popular. These multi-piece balls have become more popular for several reasons including new manufacturing technologies, lower material costs, and desirable ball playing performance properties. Many golf balls used today have multi-layered cores comprising an inner core and at least one surrounding outer core layer. For example, the inner core may be made of a relatively soft and resilient material, while the outer core may be made of a harder and more rigid material. The “dual-core” sub-assembly is encapsulated by a single or multi-layered cover to provide a final ball assembly. Different materials can be used to manufacture the core and cover and impart desirable properties to the finished ball.

In general, dual-cores comprising an inner core (or center) and a surrounding outer core layer are known in the industry. For example, Sugimoto, U.S. Pat. No. 6,390,935 discloses a three-piece golf ball comprising a core having a center and outer shell and a cover disposed about the core. The specific gravity of the outer shell is greater than the specific gravity of the center. The center has JIS-C hardness (X) at the center point and JIS-C hardness (Y) at a surface point satisfying the equation: (Y−X)≧8. The core structure (center and outer shell) has JIS-C hardness (Z) at a surface of 80 or greater. The cover has a Shore D hardness of less than 60.

Endo, U.S. Pat. No. 6,520,872 discloses a three-piece golf ball comprising a center, an intermediate layer formed over the center, and a cover formed over the intermediate layer. The center is preferably made of high-cis polybutadiene rubber; and the intermediate and cover layers are preferably made of an ionomer resin such as an ethylene acid copolymer.

Watanabe, U.S. Pat. No. 7,160,208 discloses a three-piece golf ball comprising a rubber-based inner core; a rubber-based outer core layer; and a polyurethane elastomer-based cover. The inner core layer has JIS-C hardness of 50 to 85; the outer core layer has JIS-C hardness of 70 to 90; and the cover has Shore D hardness of 46 to 55. Also, the inner core has a specific gravity of more than 1.0, and the core outer layer has a specific gravity equal to or greater than that of that of the inner core.

The core structure as an engine or spring for the golf ball. Thus, the composition and construction of the core is a key factor in determining the resiliency and rebounding performance of the ball. In general, the rebounding performance of the ball is determined by calculating its initial velocity after being struck by the face of the golf club and its outgoing velocity after making impact with a hard surface. More particularly, the “Coefficient of Restitution” or “COR” of a golf ball refers to the ratio of a ball's rebound velocity to its initial incoming velocity when the ball is fired from an air cannon into a rigid vertical plate. The COR for a golf ball is written as a decimal value between zero and one. A golf ball may have different COR values at different initial velocities. The United States Golf Association (USGA) sets limits on the initial velocity of the ball so one objective of golf ball manufacturers is to maximize COR under such conditions. Balls with a higher rebound velocity have a higher COR value. Such golf balls rebound faster, retain more total energy when struck with a club, and have longer flight distance as opposed to balls with low COR values. These properties are particularly important for long distance shots. For example, balls having high resiliency and COR values tend to travel a far distance when struck by a driver club from a tee.

The durability, spin rate, and feel of the ball also are important properties. In general, the durability of the ball refers to the impact-resistance of the ball. Balls having low durability appear worn and damaged even when such balls are used only for brief time periods. In some instances, the cover may be cracked or torn. The spin rate refers to the ball's rate of rotation after it is hit by a club. Balls having a relatively high spin rate are advantageous for short distance shots made with irons and wedges. Professional and highly skilled amateur golfers can place a back spin more easily on such balls. This helps a player better control the ball and improves shot accuracy and placement. By placing the right amount of spin on the ball, the player can get the ball to stop precisely on the green or place a fade on the ball during approach shots. On the other hand, recreational players who cannot intentionally control the spin of the ball when hitting it with a club are less likely to use high spin balls. For such players, the ball can spin sideways more easily and drift far-off the course, especially if it is hooked or sliced. Meanwhile, the “feel” of the ball generally refers to the sensation that a player experiences when striking the ball with the club and it is a difficult property to quantify. Most players prefer balls having a soft feel, because the player experience a more natural and comfortable sensation when their club face makes contact with these balls. Balls having a softer feel are particularly desirable when making short shots around the green, because the player senses more with such balls. The feel of the ball primarily depends upon the hardness and compression of the ball.

Manufacturers of golf balls are constantly looking to different materials for improving the playing performance and other properties of the ball. For example, golf balls containing cores made from foam compositions are generally known in the industry. Puckett and Cadorniga, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,836,552 and 4,839,116 disclose one-piece, short distance golf balls made of a foam composition comprising a thermoplastic polymer (ethylene acid copolymer ionomer such as Surlyn®) and filler material (microscopic glass bubbles). The density of the composition increases from the center to the surface of the ball. Thus, the ball has relatively dense outer skin and a cellular inner core. According to the '552 and '116 Patents, by providing a short distance golf ball, which will play approximately 50% of the distance of a conventional golf ball, the land requirements for a golf course can be reduced 67% to 50%.

Gentiluomo, U.S. Pat. No. 5,104,126 discloses a three-piece golf ball (FIG. 2) containing a high density center (3) made of steel, surrounded by an outer core (4) of low density resilient syntactic foam composition, and encapsulated by an ethylene acid copolymer ionomer (Surlyn®) cover (5). The '126 Patent defines the syntactic foam as being a low density composition consisting of granulated cork or hollow spheres of either phenolic, epoxy, ceramic or glass, dispersed within a resilient elastomer.

Aoyama, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,688,192 and 5,823,889 disclose a golf ball containing a core, wherein the core comprising an inner and outer portion, and a cover made of a material such as balata rubber or ethylene acid copolymer ionomer. The core is made by foaming, injecting a compressible material, gasses, blowing agents, or gas-containing microspheres into polybutadiene or other core material. According to the '889 Patent, polyurethane compositions may be used. The compressible material, for example, gas-containing compressible cells may be dispersed in a limited part of the core so that the portion containing the compressible material has a specific gravity of greater than 1.00. Alternatively, the compressible material may be dispersed throughout the entire core. In one embodiment, the core comprises an inner and outer portion. In another embodiment, the core comprises inner and outer layers.

Sullivan and Ladd, U.S. Pat. No. 6,688,991 discloses a golf ball containing a low specific gravity core, optional intermediate layer, and high specific gravity cover with Shore D hardness in the range of about 40 to about 80. The core is preferably made from a highly neutralized thermoplastic polymer such as ethylene acid copolymer which has been foamed.

Nesbitt, U.S. Pat. No. 6,767,294 discloses a golf ball comprising: i) a pressurized foamed inner center formed from a thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof, a blowing agent and a cross-linking agent and, ii) an outer core layer formed from a second thermoset material, a thermoplastic material, or combinations thereof. Additionally, a barrier resin or film can be applied over the outer core layer to reduce the diffusion of the internal gas and pressure from the nucleus (center and outer core layer). Preferred polymers for the barrier layer have low permeability such as Saran® film (poly (vinylidene chloride), Barex® resin (acyrlonitrile-co-methyl acrylate), poly (vinyl alcohol), and PET film (polyethylene terephthalate). The '294 Patent does not disclose core layers having different hardness gradients.

Sullivan, Ladd, and Hebert, U.S. Pat. No. 7,708,654 discloses a golf ball having a foamed intermediate layer. Referring to FIG. 1 in the '654 Patent, the golf ball includes a core (12), an intermediate layer (14) made of a highly neutralized polymer having a reduced specific gravity (less than 0.95), and a cover (16). According to the '654 Patent, the intermediate layer can be an outer core, a mantle layer, or an inner cover. The reduction in specific gravity of the intermediate layer is caused by foaming the composition of the layer and this reduction can be as high as 30%. The '654 Patent discloses that other foamed compositions such as foamed polyurethanes and polyureas may be used to form the intermediate layer.

Tutmark, U.S. Pat. No. 8,272,971 is directed to golf balls containing an element that reduces the distance of the ball's flight path. In one embodiment, the ball includes a core and cover. A cavity is formed between core and cover and this may be filled by a foamed polyurethane “middle layer” in order to dampen the ball's flight properties. The foam of the middle layer is relatively light in weight; and the core is relatively heavy and dense. According to the '971 Patent, when a golfer strikes the ball with a club, the foam in the middle layer actuates and compresses, thereby absorbing much of the impact from the impact of the ball.

Although some foam core constructions for gold balls have been considered over the years, there are drawbacks with using many foam materials. For example, one drawback with some polyurethane foams is they may have relatively low thermal-stability. That is, some of these foam compositions do not have good heat-resistance and may degrade when exposed to high temperatures. To make finished golf balls containing foam cores, a thermoplastic or thermoset composition, for example, polybutadiene rubber, is molded over the foam material. In such molding operations, a substantial level of heat and pressure is applied to the core structure. If the foam inner core does not have good thermal-stability, the foam may collapse on itself. The chemical and physical properties of the foam composition may change and the properties of the resulting golf ball core may be adversely affected. For example, there may be a negative impact on the size, resiliency, and stiffness of the foam core.

In view of some of the disadvantages with some golf ball foam cores, it would be desirable to have foam cores with high heat stability. The foam cores also should have good resiliency, rebounding performance, and durability. The present invention provides new foam core compositions and constructions having such properties as well as other advantageous features and benefits. The invention also encompasses golf balls containing the improved core constructions.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a multi-piece golf ball comprising a solid core assembly having at least two layers and a cover having at least one layer. In one version, the dual-layered core assembly includes: i) an inner core (center) comprising a foamed silicone rubber composition, wherein the inner core has a diameter in the range of about 0.100 to about 1.100 inches and a specific gravity (SG_(inner)), and ii) an outer core layer comprising a non-foamed thermoset or thermoplastic material, wherein the outer core layer is disposed about the inner core and has a thickness in the range of about 0.100 to about 0.750 inches and a specific gravity (SG_(outer)). Preferably, the SG_(outer) is greater than the SG_(inner).

Thermoset or thermoplastic materials are used to form the outer core layer in the present invention. In one embodiment, the thermoset and thermoplastic materials are non-foamed. Thus, the dual-core includes a silicone foam rubber inner core (center) and a surrounding non-foamed thermoset or thermoplastic outer core layer. The inner core comprising the silicone foam rubber composition has good thermal stability. Thus, the thermoset or thermoplastic composition may be molded more effectively over the inner core, and the chemical and physical properties of the inner core will not degrade substantially. For example, polybutadiene rubber may be used to make the outer core layer. The core layers may have different thicknesses and specific gravities. For example, the inner core may have a diameter in the range of about 0.100 to about 0.900 inches, particularly 0.400 to 0.800 inches; and a specific gravity in the range of about 0.25 to about 1.25 g/cc, particularly 0.30 to 0.95 g/cc. For example, the outer core layer may have a thickness in the range of about 0.250 to about 0.750 inches and a specific gravity in the range of about 0.60 to about 2.90 g/cc.

The core layers may have different hardness gradients. For example, each core layer may have a positive, zero, or negative hardness gradient. In a first embodiment, the inner core has a positive hardness gradient; and the outer core layer has a positive hardness gradient. In a second embodiment, the inner core has a positive hardness gradient, and the outer core layer has zero or negative hardness gradient. In yet another version, the inner core has a zero or negative hardness gradient; and the outer core layer has a positive hardness gradient. In another alternative version, both the inner and outer core layers have zero or negative hardness gradients.

In one preferred embodiment of this invention, the core has adjoining foam layers. For example, the inner core (center) may comprise a foamed silicone rubber composition, and the outer core layer may comprise a foamed polyurethane composition. In other examples, the outer core layer comprises a foamed thermoset polybutadiene rubber or a foamed thermoplastic highly neutralized ionomer composition such as an ethylene (meth)acrylic acid copolymer that has been neutralized to at least 90%. Preferably, the inner core has a diameter in the range of about 0.100 to about 1.100 inches and a specific gravity (SG_(inner)); and the outer core has a thickness in the range of about 0.100 to about 0.750 inches and a specific gravity (SG_(outer)), wherein SG_(outer) is greater than the SG_(inner).

In another embodiment, a multi-piece golf ball comprising a solid core having three layers and a cover having at least one layer is made. This ball may have different constructions. For example, in one version, the multi-layered core includes: i) an inner core (center) comprising a foamed silicone rubber composition, wherein the inner core has a diameter in the range of about 0.100 to about 1.100 inches and a specific gravity (SG_(inner)); ii) an intermediate layer comprising a non-foamed thermoset or thermoplastic material, wherein the intermediate layer is disposed about the inner core and has a thickness in the range of about 0.050 to about 0.400 inches and a specific gravity (SG_(intermediate)); and iii) an outer core layer comprising a thermoset material, wherein the outer cover layer is disposed about the intermediate core layer and has a thickness in the range of about 0.200 to about 0.750 inches and a specific gravity (SG_(outer)). Preferably, the SG_(inner) is less than the SG_(intermediate) and SG_(outer). That is, the SG_(outer) is greater than the SG_(inner) and the SG_(intermediate) is greater than the SG_(inner). In another version, the outer core layer of the three-layered core is made of a thermoplastic composition.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The novel features that are characteristic of the present invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, the preferred embodiments of the invention, together with further objects and attendant advantages, are best understood by reference to the following detailed description in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a spherical inner core made of a foamed composition in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of one embodiment of upper and lower mold cavities used to make the dual-layered cores of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a three-piece golf ball having a dual-layered core made in accordance with the present invention; and

FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of a four-piece golf ball having a dual-layered core made in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Golf Ball Constructions

Golf balls having various constructions may be made in accordance with this invention. For example, golf balls having three piece, four-piece, and five-piece constructions with single or multi-layered cover materials may be made. Representative illustrations of such golf ball constructions are provided and discussed further below. The term, “layer” as used herein means generally any spherical portion of the golf ball. More particularly, in one version, a three-piece golf ball containing a dual-layered core and single-layered cover is made. The dual-core includes an inner core (center) and surrounding outer core layer. In another version, a four-piece golf ball containing a dual-core and dual-cover (inner cover and outer cover layers) is made. In yet another construction, a four-piece or five-piece golf ball containing a dual-core; casing layer(s); and cover layer(s) may be made. As used herein, the term, “casing layer” means a layer of the ball disposed between the multi-layered core sub-assembly and cover. The casing layer also may be referred to as a mantle or intermediate layer. The diameter and thickness of the different layers along with properties such as hardness and compression may vary depending upon the construction and desired playing performance properties of the golf ball.

Inner Core Composition

In general, silicone foam compositions are made by forming gas bubbles in a polymer mixture using a foaming (blowing) agent. As the bubbles form, the mixture expands and forms a foam composition that can be molded into an end-use product having either an open or closed cellular structure. Flexible foams generally have an open cell structure, where the cells walls are incomplete and contain small holes through which liquid and air can permeate. Such flexible foams are used traditionally for automobile seats, cushioning, mattresses, and the like. Rigid foams generally have a closed cell structure, where the cell walls are continuous and complete, and are used for used traditionally for automobile panels and parts, building insulation and the like. Many foams contain both open and closed cells. It also is possible to formulate flexible foams having a closed cell structure and likewise to formulate rigid foams having an open cell structure. As described in Daniel Klempner and Kurt C. Firsch, eds., Handbook of Polymeric Foams and Foam Technology, (Munich, Vienna, N.Y., Barcelona: Hanser Publishers, 1991), silicone foams are generally produced by the condensation reaction between SiH and SiOH as shown below. SiH+SiOH+catalyst→SiOSI+H

When these two components are mixed together, they generate hydrogen gas which causes bubbles to form within the composition. The gas becomes trapped in cells to produce foam. During the curing step, the “liquid foam” (mixed liquid reactants) are transformed into a solid material. These reactions can occur at room temperature, when the three necessary components (SiH-containing cross-linker, SiOH-containing polymer, and catalyst) are mixed together. These foams can be considered two-part systems (the SiH-containing cross-linker makes up one component; and the SiOH-containing polymer and catalyst make-up the second component.) A variety of catalysts including tin, zinc, and platinum-based compounds, can be used to promote these reactions.

In the present invention, the inner core (center) comprises a lightweight foam silicone composition. The foam may have an open or closed cellular structure or combinations thereof and the foam structure may range from a relatively rigid foam to a very flexible foam. Referring to FIG. 1, a foamed inner core (4) having a geometric center (6) and outer skin (8) may be prepared in accordance with this invention.

As discussed above, hydrogen gas, which evolves as during the reactions, is the most common foaming (blowing) agent used to make silicone foam. However, other foaming agents may be introduced into the polymer formulation to generate the foam cells. In general, there are two types of foaming agents: physical foaming agents and chemical foaming agents.

Physical Foaming Agents.

These foaming agents typically are gasses that are introduced under high pressure directly into the polymer composition. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and partially halogenated chlorofluorocarbons are effective, but these compounds are banned in many countries because of their environmental side effects. Alternatively, aliphatic and cyclic hydrocarbon gasses such as isobutene and pentane may be used. Inert gasses, such as carbon dioxide and nitrogen, also are suitable.

Chemical Foaming Agents.

These foaming agents typically are in the form of powder, pellets, or liquids and they are added to the composition, where they decompose or react during heating and generate gaseous by-products (for example, nitrogen or carbon dioxide).

The gas is dispersed and trapped throughout the composition and foams it.

Hydroxyl-containing materials that react with some of the SiH-containing cross-linker during the silicone-forming reaction are preferred blowing agents. Different sources of hydroxyl groups may be used including water and alcohols. Hydroxyl-containing polysiloxanes also can be used. Other chemical blowing agents include inorganic compounds, such as ammonium carbonate and carbonates of alkalai metals, or may organic compounds, such as azo and diazo compounds, such as nitrogen-based azo compounds. Suitable azo compounds include, but are not limited to, 2,2′-azobis(2-cyanobutane), 2,2′-azobis(methylbutyronitrile), azodicarbonamide, p,p′-oxybis(benzene sulfonyl hydrazide), p-toluene sulfonyl semicarbazide, p-toluene sulfonyl hydrazide. Other foaming agents include any of the Celogens® sold by Crompton Chemical Corporation, and nitroso compounds, sulfonylhydrazides, azides of organic acids and their analogs, triazines, tri- and tetrazole derivatives, sulfonyl semicarbazides, urea derivatives, guanidine derivatives, and esters such as alkoxyboroxines. Also, foaming agents that liberate gasses as a result of chemical interaction between components such as mixtures of acids and metals, mixtures of organic acids and inorganic carbonates, mixtures of nitriles and ammonium salts, and the hydrolytic decomposition of urea may be used. As discussed above, other hydroxyl-containing materials such as water and alcohol-based materials may be used.

Commercially-available silicone foam compositions that can be used in accordance with this invention include, for example, silicone foams available from Dow Corning Corp. (Midland, Mich.); Rogers Corp (Carol Stream, Ill.); and Saint Gobain Performance Plastics (Hoosick Falls, N.Y.). In addition to the foaming agent as discussed above, the foam composition also may include other ingredients such as, for example, fillers, cross-linking agents, chain extenders, surfactants, dyes and pigments, coloring agents, fluorescent agents, adsorbents, stabilizers, softening agents, impact modifiers, antioxidants, antiozonants, and the like.

Fillers.

The silicone foam composition may contain fillers such as, for example, mineral filler particulate. Suitable mineral filler particulates include compounds such as zinc oxide, limestone, silica, mica, barytes, lithopone, zinc sulfide, talc, calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate, clays, powdered metals and alloys such as bismuth, brass, bronze, cobalt, copper, iron, nickel, tungsten, aluminum, tin, precipitated hydrated silica, fumed silica, mica, calcium metasilicate, barium sulfate, zinc sulfide, lithopone, silicates, silicon carbide, diatomaceous earth, carbonates such as calcium or magnesium or barium carbonate, sulfates such as calcium or magnesium or barium sulfate. Silicon dioxides are particularly preferred because they are based on Si—O bonds and these materials are compatible with the Si—O—Si backbone of the silicone foam. Adding fillers to the composition provides many benefits including helping improve the stiffness and strength of the composition. The mineral fillers tend to help decrease the size of the foam cells and increase cell density. The mineral fillers also tend to help improve the physical properties of the foam such as hardness, compression set, and tensile strength.

More particularly, clay particulate fillers, such as Garamite® mixed mineral thixotropes and Cloisite® and Nanofil® nanoclays, commercially available from Southern Clay Products, Inc., and Nanomax® and Nanomer® nanoclays, commercially available from Nanocor, Inc may be used. Other nano-scale materials such as nanotubes and nanoflakes also may be used. Also, talc particulate (e.g., Luzenac HAR® high aspect ratio talcs, commercially available from Luzenac America, Inc.), glass (e.g., glass flake, milled glass, and microglass), and combinations thereof may be used. Metal oxide fillers have good heat-stability and include, for example, aluminum oxide, zinc oxide, tin oxide, barium sulfate, zinc sulfate, calcium oxide, calcium carbonate, zinc carbonate, barium carbonate, tungsten, tungsten carbide, and lead silicate fillers. These metal oxides and other metal fillers such as, for example, particulate; powders; flakes; and fibers of copper, steel, brass, tungsten, titanium, aluminum, magnesium, molybdenum, cobalt, nickel, iron, lead, tin, zinc, barium, bismuth, bronze, silver, gold, and platinum, and alloys and combinations thereof may be added to the silicone foam composition.

Surfactants.

The silicone foam composition also may contain surfactants to stabilize the foam and help control the foam cell size and structure. In one preferred version, the foam composition includes silicone surfactant which is very compatible with the silicone foam system. In general, the silicone surfactant helps regulate the foam cell size and stabilizes the cell walls to prevent the cells from collapsing. As discussed above, the liquid reactants react to form the foam rapidly. The “liquid” foam develops into solid silicone foam in a relatively short period of time. If a silicone surfactant is not added, the gas-liquid interface between the liquid reactants and expanding gas bubbles may not support the stress. As a result, the cell window can crack or rupture and there can be cell wall drainage. In turn, the foam can collapse on itself. Adding a silicone surfactant helps create a surface tension gradient along the gas-liquid interface and helps reduce cell wall drainage. The silicone surfactant has a relatively low surface tension and thus can lower the surface tension of the foam. It is believed the silicone surfactant orients itself the foam cell walls and lowers the surface tension to create the surface tension gradient. Blowing efficiency and nucleation are supported by adding the silicone surfactant and thus more bubbles are created in the system. The silicone surfactant also helps create a greater number of smaller sized foam cells and increases the closed cell content of the foam due to the surfactant's lower surface tension. Thus, the cell structure in the foam is maintained as the as gas is prevented from diffusing out through the cell walls. Along with the decrease in cell size, there is a decrease in thermal conductivity. The resulting foam material also tends to have greater compression strength and modulus. These improved physical properties may be due to the increase in closed cell content and smaller cell size.

As discussed further below, in one preferred embodiment, the specific gravity (density) of the foam inner core is less than the specific gravity of the outer core. If mineral filler or other additives are included in the foam composition, they should not be added in an amount that would increase the specific gravity (density) of the foam inner core to a level such that it would be greater than the specific gravity of the outer core layer. If the ball's mass is concentrated towards the outer surface (for example, outer core layers), and the outer core layer has a higher specific gravity than the inner core, the ball has a relatively high Moment of Inertia (MOI). In such balls, most of the mass is located away from the ball's axis of rotation and thus more force is needed to generate spin. These balls have a generally low spin rate as the ball leaves the club's face after contact between the ball and club. Such core structures (wherein the specific gravity of the outer core is greater than the specific gravity of the inner core) is preferred in the present invention. Thus, in one preferred embodiment, the concentration of mineral filler particulate in the foam composition is in the range of about 0.1 to about 9.0% by weight.

Properties of Silicone Foams

The silicone foam compositions of this invention have numerous chemical and physical properties making them suitable for core assemblies in golf balls.

The density of the foam is an important property and is defines as the weight per unit volume (typically, g/cm³) and can be measured per ASTM D-1622. The hardness, stiffness, and load-bearing capacity of the foam are independent of the foam's density, although foams having a high density typically have high hardness and stiffness. Normally, foams having higher densities have higher compression strength. Surprisingly, the foam compositions used to produce the inner core of the golf balls per this invention have a relatively low density; however, the foams are not necessarily soft and flexible, rather, they may be relatively firm, rigid, or semi-rigid depending upon the desired golf ball properties. Tensile strength, tear-resistance, and elongation generally refer to the foam's ability to resist breaking or tearing, and these properties can be measured per ASTM D-1623. The durability of foams is important, because introducing fillers and other additives into the foam composition can increase the tendency of the foam to break or tear apart. In general, the tensile strength of the foam compositions of this invention is in the range of about 20 to about 1000 psi (parallel to the foam rise) and about 50 to about 1000 psi (perpendicular to the foam rise) as measured per ASTM D-1623 at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity (RH). Meanwhile, the flex modulus of the foams of this invention is generally in the range of about 5 to about 45 kPa as measured per ASTM D-790, and the foams generally have a compressive modulus of 200 to 50,000 psi.

In another test, compression strength is measured on an Instron machine according to ASTM D-1621. The foam is cut into blocks and the compression strength is measured as the force required to compress the block by 10%. In general, the compressive strength of the foam compositions of this invention is in the range of about 100 to about 1800 psi (parallel and perpendicular to the foam rise) as measured per ASTM D-1621 at 23° C. and 50% relative humidity (RH). The test is conducted perpendicular to the rise of the foam or parallel to the rise of the foam. The Percentage (%) of Compression Set also can be used. This is a measure of the permanent deformation of a foam sample after it has been compressed between two metal plates under controlled time and temperature condition (standard—22 hours at 70° C. (158° F.)). The foam is compressed to a thickness given as a percentage of its original thickness that remained “set.” Preferably, the Compression Set of the foam is less than ten percent (10%), that is, the foam recovers to a point of 90% or greater of its original thickness.

In addition, the silicone foams have high thermal-stability. Thus, the foam can resist changes to its structure and physical properties as the temperature increases. The silicone foam can withstand high temperature for extended time periods without substantial decreases in chemical and physical properties. In general, many silicone foams can withstand temperatures in the range of about −100° F. (73° C.) to about 500° F. (260° C.). These heat-resistant properties are particularly important during the molding operation, where substantial heat and pressure are applied to the mold cavities and molding process temperatures may vary over a wide range. As discussed further below, an outer core thermoplastic or thermoset layer is molded over the silicone foam core. A single or multi-layered cover is molded over this core structure. During these molding steps, it is important the core composition does not melt or thermally degrade. The foam composition must be able to hold-up under high temperatures so that its chemical and physical properties are not adversely affected. The cores comprising the silicone foam compositions of this invention have high heat-stability. The cores show improved heat-stability without sacrificing properties such as resiliency and durability.

The thermal stability of the above silicone foam composition can be measured by thermogravimetry. Preferably, the foam composition has a weight loss at 250° C., based on the weight of the mixture at 25° C., of preferably not more than 5 wt. %, more preferably not more than 4 wt. %, and even more preferably not more than 1 wt. %.

It should be noted that silicone sponge rubber, silicone solid rubber, and silicone foam rubber are different materials having different properties and appearances. In general, manufacturing silicone sponge and solid rubber involves processing a gum-type silicone material through hard-pressure calendar rollers. The silicone material is then run through a curing apparatus that continuously vulcanizes the sponge rubber. Such silicone sponge and solid rubber materials are described in Sullivan, Keller, and Binette, U.S. Pat. No. 7,384,349. In contrast, silicone foam rubber is made from liquid components that are mixed together and cured.

As discussed above, to make silicone foam rubber, the first component (Component A) generally consists of SiOH-containing compound and catalyst; and the second component (Component B) generally consists of the SiH-containing compound. These liquid components are metered to a mixing chamber, where the components are mixed using a mechanical mixer or static mixer. Alternatively, the components can be manually mixed together. An exothermic reaction occurs when the ingredients are mixed together and this continues as the reactive mixture is dispensed into the mold cavities (otherwise referred to as half-molds or mold cups). The mold cavities may be referred to as first and second, or upper and lower, mold cavities. The mold cavities preferably are made of metal such as, for example, brass or silicon bronze.

Referring to FIG. 2, the mold cavities are generally indicated at (9) and (10). The lower and upper mold cavities (9, 10) are placed in lower and upper mold frame plates (11, 12). The frame plates (11, 12) contain guide pins and complementary alignment holes (not shown in drawing). The guide pins are inserted into the alignment holes to secure the lower plate (11) to the upper plate (12). The lower and upper mold cavities (9, 10) are mated together as the frame plates (11, 12) are fastened. When the lower and upper mold cavities (9, 10) are joined together, they define an interior spherical cavity that houses the spherical core. The upper mold contains a vent or hole (14) to allow for the expanding foam to fill the cavities uniformly. A secondary overflow chamber (16), which is located above the vent (14), can be used to adjust the amount of foam overflow and thus adjust the density of the core structure being molded in the cavities. As the lower and upper mold cavities (9, 10) are mated together and sufficient heat and pressure is applied, the foamed composition cures and solidifies to form a relatively rigid and lightweight spherical core. The resulting cores are cooled and then removed from the mold.

Both the silicone sponge rubber and silicone foam rubber are cellular in nature. However, the silicone sponge rubber tends to have a higher density, higher tensile strength, and higher material weight versus the silicone foam rubber. Because the silicone foam rubber generally contains more air, it is generally softer and lower in density than silicone sponge rubber. The silicone foam rubber also has better compression set properties than the silicone sponge rubber.

Hardness of the Inner Core

As shown in FIG. 1, a foamed inner core (4) having a geometric center (6) and outer skin (8) may be prepared per the molding method discussed above. The outer skin (8) is generally a non-foamed region that forms the outer surface of the core structure. The resulting inner core preferably has a diameter within a range of about 0.100 to about 1.100 inches. For example, the inner core may have a diameter within a range of about 0.250 to about 1.000 inches. In another example, the inner core may have a diameter within a range of about 0.300 to about 0.800 inches. More particularly, the inner core preferably has a diameter size with a lower limit of about 0.10 or 0.12 or 0.15 or 0.25 or 0.30 or 0.35 or 0.45 or 0.55 inches and an upper limit of about 0.60 or 0.65 or 0.70 or 0.80 or 0.90 or 1.00 or 1.10 inches. The outer skin (8) of the inner core is relatively thin preferably having a thickness of less than about 0.020 inches and more preferably less than 0.010 inches. In one preferred embodiment, the foamed core has a “positive” hardness gradient (that is, the outer skin of the inner core is harder than its geometric center.)

For example, the geometric center hardness of the inner core (H_(inner core center)), as measured in Shore C units, is about 10 Shore C or greater and preferably has a lower limit of about 10 or 16 or 20 or 25 or 30 or 32 or 34 or 36 or 40 Shore C and an upper limit of about 42 or 44 or 48 or 50 or 52 or 56 or 60 or 62 or 65 or 68 or 70 or 74 or 78 or 80 Shore C. In one preferred version, the geometric center hardness of the inner core (H_(inner core center)) is about 60 Shore C. When a flexible, relatively soft foam is used, the (H_(inner core center)) of the foam may have a Shore A hardness of about 5 or greater, and preferably has a lower limit of 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, or 35 Shore A and an upper limit of about 60, 65, 70, 80, 85, or 90 Shore A. In one preferred embodiment, the geometric center hardness of the inner core is about 55 Shore A. The H_(inner core center), as measured in Shore D units, is about 15 Shore D or greater and more preferably within a range having a lower limit of about 15 or 18 or 20 or 22 or 25 or 28 or 30 or 32 or 36 or 40 or 44 Shore D and an upper limit of about 45 or 48 or 50 or 52 or 55 or 58 or 60 or 62 or 64 or 66 or 70 or 72 or 74 or 78 or 80 or 82 or 84 or 88 or 90 Shore D. Meanwhile, the outer surface hardness of the inner core (H_(inner core surface)), as measured in Shore C, is about 20 Shore C or greater and preferably has a lower limit of about 13 or 17 or 20 or 22 or 24 or 28 or 30 or 32 or 35 or 36 or 40 or 42 or 44 or 48 or 50 or 52 or 55 or 58 or 60 or 62 or 65 and an upper limit of about or 68 or 70 or 74 or 78 or 80 or 86 or 88 or 90 or 92 or 96 Shore C. The outer surface hardness of the inner core ((H_(inner core surface)), as measured in Shore D units, preferably has a lower limit of about 25 or 28 or 30 or 32 or 36 or 40 or 44 Shore D and an upper limit of about 45 or 48 or 50 or 52 or 55 or 58 or 60 or 62 or 64 or 66 or 70 or 74 or 78 or 80 or 82 or 84 or 88 or 90 or 94 or 96 Shore D. When measured in Shore A units, the outer surface hardness of the inner core ((H_(inner core surface)) general has a hardness of about 5 or greater, and preferably has a lower limit of 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 32, 35, or 40 Shore A and an upper limit of about 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 80, 85, or 90 Shore A.

Density of the Inner Core

The foamed inner core preferably has a specific gravity of about 0.25 to about 1.25 g/cc. That is, the density of the inner core (as measured at any point of the inner core structure) is preferably within the range of about 0.25 to about 1.25 g/cc. By the term, “specific gravity of the inner core” (“SG_(inner)”), it is generally meant the specific gravity of the inner core as measured at any point of the inner core structure. It should be understood, however, that the specific gravity values, as taken at different points of the inner core structure, may vary. For example, the foamed inner core may have a “positive” density gradient (that is, the outer surface (skin) of the inner core may have a density greater than the geometric center of the inner core.) In one preferred version, the specific gravity of the geometric center of the inner core (SG_(center of inner core)) is less than 1.00 g/cc and more preferably 0.90 g/cc or less. More particularly, in one version, the (SG_(center of inner core)) is in the range of about 0.10 to about 0.90 g/cc. For example, the (SG_(center of inner core)) may be within a range having a lower limit of about 0.10 or 0.15 of 0.20 or 0.24 or 0.30 or 0.35 or 0.37 or 0.40 or 0.42 or 0.45 or 0.47 or 0.50 and an upper limit of about 0.60 or 0.65 or 0.70 or 0.74 or 0.78 or 0.80, or 0.82 or 0.84 or 0.85 or 0.88 or 0.90 g/cc. Meanwhile, the specific gravity of the outer surface (skin) of the inner core (SG_(skin of inner core)), in one preferred version, is greater than about 0.90 g/cc and more preferably greater than 1.00 g/cc. For example, the (SG_(skin of inner core)) may fall within the range of about 0.90 to about 2.00. More particularly, in one version, the (SG_(skin of inner core)) may have a specific gravity with a lower limit of about 0.90 or 0.92 or 0.95 or 0.98 or 1.00 or 1.02 or 1.06 or 1.10 or 1.12 or 1.15 or 1.18 and an upper limit of about 1.20 or 1.24 or 1.30 or 1.32 or 1.35 or 1.38 or 1.40 or 1.44 or 1.50 or 1.60 or 1.65 or 1.70 or 1.76 or 1.80 or 1.90 or 1.92 or 2.00. In other instances, the outer skin may have a specific gravity of less than 0.90 g/cc. For example, the specific gravity of the outer skin (SG_(skin of inner core)) may be about 0.75 or 0.80 or 0.82 or 0.85 or 0.88 g/cc. In such instances, wherein both the (SG_(center of inner core)) and (SG_(skin of inner core)) are less than 0.90 g/cc, it is still preferred that the (SG_(center of inner core)) is less than the (SG_(skin of inner core)).

Two-Layered Cores

As discussed above, the inner core (center) is made preferably from a foamed silicone composition. Preferably, a two-layered or dual-core is made, wherein the inner core is surrounded by an outer core layer. In one preferred embodiment, the outer core layer is formed from a non-foamed thermoset composition and more preferably from a non-foamed thermoset rubber composition.

Suitable thermoset rubber materials that may be used to form the outer core layer include, but are not limited to, polybutadiene, polyisoprene, ethylene propylene rubber (“EPR”), ethylene-propylene-diene (“EPDM”) rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, styrenic block copolymer rubbers (such as “SI”, “SIS”, “SB”, “SBS”, “SIBS”, and the like, where “S” is styrene, “I” is isobutylene, and “B” is butadiene), polyalkenamers such as, for example, polyoctenamer, butyl rubber, halobutyl rubber, polystyrene elastomers, polyethylene elastomers, polyurethane elastomers, polyurea elastomers, metallocene-catalyzed elastomers and plastomers, copolymers of isobutylene and p-alkylstyrene, halogenated copolymers of isobutylene and p-alkylstyrene, copolymers of butadiene with acrylonitrile, polychloroprene, alkyl acrylate rubber, chlorinated isoprene rubber, acrylonitrile chlorinated isoprene rubber, and blends of two or more thereof. Preferably, the outer core layer is formed from a polybutadiene rubber composition.

The thermoset rubber composition may be cured using conventional curing processes. Suitable curing processes include, for example, peroxide-curing, sulfur-curing, high-energy radiation, and combinations thereof. Preferably, the rubber composition contains a free-radical initiator selected from organic peroxides, high energy radiation sources capable of generating free-radicals, and combinations thereof. In one preferred version, the rubber composition is peroxide-cured. Suitable organic peroxides include, but are not limited to, dicumyl peroxide; n-butyl-4,4-di(t-butylperoxy) valerate; 1,1-di(t-butylperoxy)3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane; 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy) hexane; di-t-butyl peroxide; di-t-amyl peroxide; t-butyl peroxide; t-butyl cumyl peroxide; 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)hexyne-3; di(2-t-butyl-peroxyisopropyl)benzene; dilauroyl peroxide; dibenzoyl peroxide; t-butyl hydroperoxide; and combinations thereof. In a particular embodiment, the free radical initiator is dicumyl peroxide, including, but not limited to Perkadox® BC, commercially available from Akzo Nobel. Peroxide free-radical initiators are generally present in the rubber composition in an amount of at least 0.05 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber, or an amount within the range having a lower limit of 0.05 parts or 0.1 parts or 1 part or 1.25 parts or 1.5 parts or 2.5 parts or 5 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubbers, and an upper limit of 2.5 parts or 3 parts or 5 parts or 6 parts or 10 parts or 15 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber. Concentrations are in parts per hundred (phr) unless otherwise indicated. As used herein, the term, “parts per hundred,” also known as “phr” or “pph” is defined as the number of parts by weight of a particular component present in a mixture, relative to 100 parts by weight of the polymer component. Mathematically, this can be expressed as the weight of an ingredient divided by the total weight of the polymer, multiplied by a factor of 100.

The rubber compositions may further include a reactive cross-linking co-agent. Suitable co-agents include, but are not limited to, metal salts of unsaturated carboxylic acids having from 3 to 8 carbon atoms; unsaturated vinyl compounds and polyfunctional monomers (e.g., trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate); phenylene bismaleimide; and combinations thereof. Particular examples of suitable metal salts include, but are not limited to, one or more metal salts of acrylates, diacrylates, methacrylates, and dimethacrylates, wherein the metal is selected from magnesium, calcium, zinc, aluminum, lithium, and nickel. In a particular embodiment, the co-agent is selected from zinc salts of acrylates, diacrylates, methacrylates, and dimethacrylates. In another particular embodiment, the agent is zinc diacrylate (ZDA). When the co-agent is zinc diacrylate and/or zinc dimethacrylate, the co-agent is typically included in the rubber composition in an amount within the range having a lower limit of 1 or 5 or 10 or 15 or 19 or 20 parts by weight per 100 parts of the total rubber, and an upper limit of 24 or 25 or 30 or 35 or 40 or 45 or 50 or 60 parts by weight per 100 parts of the base rubber.

Radical scavengers such as a halogenated organosulfur, organic disulfide, or inorganic disulfide compounds may be added to the rubber composition. These compounds also may function as “soft and fast agents.” As used herein, “soft and fast agent” means any compound or a blend thereof that is capable of making a core: 1) softer (having a lower compression) at a constant “coefficient of restitution” (COR); and/or 2) faster (having a higher COR at equal compression), when compared to a core equivalently prepared without a soft and fast agent. Preferred halogenated organosulfur compounds include, but are not limited to, pentachlorothiophenol (PCTP) and salts of PCTP such as zinc pentachlorothiophenol (ZnPCTP). Using PCTP and ZnPCTP in golf ball inner cores helps produce softer and faster inner cores. The PCTP and ZnPCTP compounds help increase the resiliency and the coefficient of restitution of the core. In a particular embodiment, the soft and fast agent is selected from ZnPCTP, PCTP, ditolyl disulfide, diphenyl disulfide, dixylyl disulfide, 2-nitroresorcinol, and combinations thereof.

The rubber composition also may include filler(s) such as materials selected from carbon black, clay and nanoclay particles as discussed above, talc (e.g., Luzenac HAR® high aspect ratio talcs, commercially available from Luzenac America, Inc.), glass (e.g., glass flake, milled glass, and microglass), mica and mica-based pigments (e.g., Iriodin® pearl luster pigments, commercially available from The Merck Group), and combinations thereof. Metal fillers such as, for example, particulate; powders; flakes; and fibers of copper, steel, brass, tungsten, titanium, aluminum, magnesium, molybdenum, cobalt, nickel, iron, lead, tin, zinc, barium, bismuth, bronze, silver, gold, and platinum, and alloys and combinations thereof also may be added to the rubber composition to adjust the specific gravity of the composition as needed. As discussed further below, in one preferred embodiment, the specific gravity of the inner core layer (for example, foamed polyurethane) has a specific gravity less than the outer core layer (for example, polybutadiene rubber). In such an event, if mineral, metal, or other fillers are added to the polybutadiene rubber composition used to form the outer core, it is important the concentration of such fillers be sufficient so that the specific gravity of the outer core layer is greater than the specific gravity of the inner core. For example, the concentration of the fillers may be in an amount of at least about 5% by weight based on total weight of composition

In addition, the rubber compositions may include antioxidants to prevent the breakdown of the elastomers. Also, processing aids such as high molecular weight organic acids and salts thereof may be added to the composition. Suitable organic acids are aliphatic organic acids, aromatic organic acids, saturated mono-functional organic acids, unsaturated monofunctional organic acids, multi-unsaturated mono-functional organic acids, and dimerized derivatives thereof. Particular examples of suitable organic acids include, but are not limited to, caproic acid, caprylic acid, capric acid, lauric acid, stearic acid, behenic acid, erucic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, myristic acid, benzoic acid, palmitic acid, phenylacetic acid, naphthalenoic acid, and dimerized derivatives thereof. The organic acids are aliphatic, mono-functional (saturated, unsaturated, or multi-unsaturated) organic acids. Salts of these organic acids may also be employed. The salts of organic acids include the salts of barium, lithium, sodium, zinc, bismuth, chromium, cobalt, copper, potassium, strontium, titanium, tungsten, magnesium, cesium, iron, nickel, silver, aluminum, tin, or calcium, salts of fatty acids, particularly stearic, behenic, erucic, oleic, linoelic or dimerized derivatives thereof. It is preferred that the organic acids and salts of the present invention be relatively non-migratory (they do not bloom to the surface of the polymer under ambient temperatures) and non-volatile (they do not volatilize at temperatures required for melt-blending.) Other ingredients such as accelerators (for example, tetra methylthiuram), processing aids, dyes and pigments, wetting agents, surfactants, plasticizers, coloring agents, fluorescent agents, chemical blowing and foaming agents, defoaming agents, stabilizers, softening agents, impact modifiers, antiozonants, as well as other additives known in the art may be added to the rubber composition.

Examples of commercially-available polybutadiene rubbers that can be used in accordance with this invention, include, but are not limited to, BR 01 and BR 1220, available from BST Elastomers of Bangkok, Thailand; SE BR 1220LA and SE BR1203, available from DOW Chemical Co of Midland, Mich.; BUDENE 1207, 1207s, 1208, and 1280 available from Goodyear, Inc of Akron, Ohio; BR 01, 51 and 730, available from Japan Synthetic Rubber (JSR) of Tokyo, Japan; BUNA CB 21, CB 22, CB 23, CB 24, CB 25, CB 29 MES, CB 60, CB Nd 60, CB 55 NF, CB 70 B, CB KA 8967, and CB 1221, available from Lanxess Corp. of Pittsburgh, Pa.; BR1208, available from LG Chemical of Seoul, South Korea; UBEPOL BR130B, BR150, BR150B, BR150L, BR230, BR360L, BR710, and VCR617, available from UBE Industries, Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan; EUROPRENE NEOCIS BR 60, INTENE 60 AF and P30AF, and EUROPRENE BR HV80, available from Polimeri Europa of Rome, Italy; AFDENE 50 and NEODENE BR40, BR45, BR50 and BR60, available from Karbochem (PTY) Ltd. of Bruma, South Africa; KBR 01, NdBr 40, NdBR-45, NdBr 60, KBR 710S, KBR 710H, and KBR 750, available from Kumho Petrochemical Co., Ltd. Of Seoul, South Korea; DIENE 55NF, 70AC, and 320 AC, available from Firestone Polymers of Akron, Ohio; and PBR-Nd Group II and Group III, available from Nizhnekamskneftekhim, Inc. of Nizhnekamsk, Tartarstan Republic.

The polybutadiene rubber is used in an amount of at least about 5% by weight based on total weight of composition and is generally present in an amount of about 5% to about 100%, or an amount within a range having a lower limit of 5% or 10% or 20% or 30% or 40% or 50% and an upper limit of 55% or 60% or 70% or 80% or 90% or 95% or 100%. Preferably, the concentration of polybutadiene rubber is about 40 to about 95 weight percent. If desirable, lesser amounts of other thermoset materials may be incorporated into the base rubber. Such materials include the rubbers discussed above, for example, cis-polyisoprene, trans-polyisoprene, balata, polychloroprene, polynorbornene, polyoctenamer, polypentenamer, butyl rubber, EPR, EPDM, styrene-butadiene, and the like.

In alternative embodiments, the outer core layer may comprise a thermoplastic material, for example, an ionomer composition containing acid groups that are at least partially-neutralized. Suitable ionomer compositions include partially-neutralized ionomers and highly-neutralized ionomers (HNPs), including ionomers formed from blends of two or more partially-neutralized ionomers, blends of two or more highly-neutralized ionomers, and blends of one or more partially-neutralized ionomers with one or more highly-neutralized ionomers. For purposes of the present disclosure, “HNP” refers to an acid copolymer after at least 70% of all acid groups present in the composition are neutralized. Preferred ionomers are salts of O/X- and O/X/Y-type acid copolymers, wherein O is an α-olefin, X is a C₃-C₈ α,β-ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid, and Y is a softening monomer. O is preferably selected from ethylene and propylene. X is preferably selected from methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, crotonic acid, and itaconic acid. Methacrylic acid and acrylic acid are particularly preferred. Y is preferably selected from (meth) acrylate and alkyl (meth) acrylates wherein the alkyl groups have from 1 to 8 carbon atoms, including, but not limited to, n-butyl (meth) acrylate, isobutyl (meth) acrylate, methyl (meth) acrylate, and ethyl (meth) acrylate.

Preferred O/X and O/X/Y-type copolymers include, without limitation, ethylene acid copolymers, such as ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/maleic anhydride, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/maleic acid mono-ester, ethylene/maleic acid, ethylene/maleic acid mono-ester, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/n-butyl (meth)acrylate, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/iso-butyl (meth)acrylate, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/methyl (meth)acrylate, ethylene/(meth)acrylic acid/ethyl (meth)acrylate terpolymers, and the like. The term, “copolymer,” as used herein, includes polymers having two types of monomers, those having three types of monomers, and those having more than three types of monomers. Preferred α, β-ethylenically unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acids are (meth) acrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, maleic acid, crotonic acid, fumaric acid, itaconic acid. (Meth) acrylic acid is most preferred. As used herein, “(meth) acrylic acid” means methacrylic acid and/or acrylic acid. Likewise, “(meth) acrylate” means methacrylate and/or acrylate.

In a particularly preferred version, highly neutralized E/X- and E/X/Y-type acid copolymers, wherein E is ethylene, X is a C₃-C₈ α,β-ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid, and Y is a softening monomer are used. X is preferably selected from methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, ethacrylic acid, crotonic acid, and itaconic acid. Methacrylic acid and acrylic acid are particularly preferred. Y is preferably an acrylate selected from alkyl acrylates and aryl acrylates and preferably selected from (meth) acrylate and alkyl (meth) acrylates wherein the alkyl groups have from 1 to 8 carbon atoms, including, but not limited to, n-butyl (meth) acrylate, isobutyl (meth) acrylate, methyl (meth) acrylate, and ethyl (meth) acrylate. Preferred E/X/Y-type copolymers are those wherein X is (meth) acrylic acid and/or Y is selected from (meth) acrylate, n-butyl (meth) acrylate, isobutyl (meth) acrylate, methyl (meth) acrylate, and ethyl (meth) acrylate. More preferred E/X/Y-type copolymers are ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid/n-butyl acrylate, ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid/methyl acrylate, and ethylene/(meth) acrylic acid/ethyl acrylate.

The amount of ethylene in the acid copolymer is typically at least 15 wt. %, preferably at least 25 wt. %, more preferably least 40 wt. %, and even more preferably at least 60 wt. %, based on total weight of the copolymer. The amount of C₃ to C₈ α,β-ethylenically unsaturated mono- or dicarboxylic acid in the acid copolymer is typically from 1 wt. % to 35 wt. %, preferably from 5 wt. % to 30 wt. %, more preferably from 5 wt. % to 25 wt. %, and even more preferably from 10 wt. % to 20 wt. %, based on total weight of the copolymer. The amount of optional softening comonomer in the acid copolymer is typically from 0 wt. % to 50 wt. %, preferably from 5 wt. % to 40 wt. %, more preferably from 10 wt. % to 35 wt. %, and even more preferably from 20 wt. % to 30 wt. %, based on total weight of the copolymer. “Low acid” and “high acid” ionomeric polymers, as well as blends of such ionomers, may be used. In general, low acid ionomers are considered to be those containing 16 wt. % or less of acid moieties, whereas high acid ionomers are considered to be those containing greater than 16 wt. % of acid moieties.

The various O/X, E/X, O/X/Y, and E/X/Y-type copolymers are at least partially neutralized with a cation source, optionally in the presence of a high molecular weight organic acid, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,756,436, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The acid copolymer can be reacted with the optional high molecular weight organic acid and the cation source simultaneously, or prior to the addition of the cation source. Suitable cation sources include, but are not limited to, metal ion sources, such as compounds of alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, transition metals, and rare earth elements; ammonium salts and monoamine salts; and combinations thereof. Preferred cation sources are compounds of magnesium, sodium, potassium, cesium, calcium, barium, manganese, copper, zinc, lead, tin, aluminum, nickel, chromium, lithium, and rare earth metals.

Other suitable thermoplastic polymers that may be used to form the outer core layer include, but are not limited to, the following polymers (including homopolymers, copolymers, and derivatives thereof.)

(a) polyesters, particularly those modified with a compatibilizing group such as sulfonate or phosphonate, including modified poly(ethylene terephthalate), modified poly(butylene terephthalate), modified poly(propylene terephthalate), modified poly(trimethylene terephthalate), modified poly(ethylene naphthenate), and those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,353,050, 6,274,298, and 6,001,930, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, and blends of two or more thereof;

(b) polyamides, polyamide-ethers, and polyamide-esters, and those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,187,864, 6,001,930, and 5,981,654, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, and blends of two or more thereof;

(c) polyurethanes, polyureas, polyurethane-polyurea hybrids, and blends of two or more thereof;

(d) fluoropolymers, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,691,066, 6,747,110 and 7,009,002, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference, and blends of two or more thereof;

(e) polystyrenes, such as poly(styrene-co-maleic anhydride), acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, poly(styrene sulfonate), polyethylene styrene, and blends of two or more thereof;

(f) polyvinyl chlorides and grafted polyvinyl chlorides, and blends of two or more thereof;

(g) polycarbonates, blends of polycarbonate/acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, blends of polycarbonate/polyurethane, blends of polycarbonate/polyester, and blends of two or more thereof;

(h) polyethers, such as polyarylene ethers, polyphenylene oxides, block copolymers of alkenyl aromatics with vinyl aromatics and polyamicesters, and blends of two or more thereof;

(i) polyimides, polyetherketones, polyamideimides, and blends of two or more thereof; and

(j) polycarbonate/polyester copolymers and blends.

It also is recognized that thermoplastic materials can be “converted” into thermoset materials by cross-linking the polymer chains so they form a network structure, and such cross-linked thermoplastic materials may be used to form the core layers in accordance with this invention. For example, thermoplastic polyolefins such as linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), and high density polyethylene (HDPE) may be cross-linked to form bonds between the polymer chains. The cross-linked thermoplastic material typically has improved physical properties and strength over non-cross-linked thermoplastics, particularly at temperatures above the crystalline melting point. Preferably a partially or fully-neutralized ionomer, as described above, is covalently cross-linked to render it into a thermoset composition (that is, it contains at least some level of covalent, irreversable cross-links). Thermoplastic polyurethanes and polyureas also may be converted into thermoset materials in accordance with the present invention.

The cross-linked thermoplastic material may be created by exposing the thermoplastic to: 1) a high-energy radiation treatment, such as electron beam or gamma radiation, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,891,973, which is incorporated by reference herein, 2) lower energy radiation, such as ultra-violet (UV) or infra-red (IR) radiation; 3) a solution treatment, such as an isocyanate or a silane; 4) incorporation of additional free radical initiator groups in the thermoplastic prior to molding; and/or 5) chemical modification, such as esterification or saponification, to name a few.

Modifications in thermoplastic polymeric structure of thermoplastic can be induced by a number of methods, including exposing the thermoplastic material to high-energy radiation or through a chemical process using peroxide. Radiation sources include, but are not limited to, gamma-rays, electrons, neutrons, protons, x-rays, helium nuclei, or the like. Gamma radiation, typically using radioactive cobalt atoms and allows for considerable depth of treatment, if necessary. For core layers requiring lower depth of penetration, electron-beam accelerators or UV and IR light sources can be used. Useful UV and IR irradiation methods are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,855,070 and 7,198,576, which are incorporated herein by reference. The thermoplastic core layers may be irradiated at dosages greater than 0.05 Mrd, preferably ranging from 1 Mrd to 20 Mrd, more preferably from 2 Mrd to 15 Mrd, and most preferably from 4 Mrd to 10 Mrd. In one preferred embodiment, the cores are irradiated at a dosage from 5 Mrd to 8 Mrd and in another preferred embodiment, the cores are irradiated with a dosage from 0.05 Mrd to 3 Mrd, more preferably 0.05 Mrd to 1.5 Mrd.

For example, a core assembly having a thermoplastic layer may be converted to a thermoset layer by placing the core assembly on a slowly move along a channel. Radiation from a radiation source, such as gamma rays, is allowed to contact the surface of the cores. The source is positioned to provide a generally uniform dose of radiation to the cores as they roll along the channel. The speed of the cores as they pass through the radiation source is easily controlled to ensure the cores receive sufficient dosage to create the desired hardness gradient. The cores are irradiated with a dosage of 1 or more Mrd, more preferably 2 Mrd to 15 Mrd. The intensity of the dosage is typically in the range of 1 MeV to 20 MeV. For thermoplastic resins having a reactive group (e.g., ionomers, thermoplastic urethanes, and the like), treating the thermoplastic core layer in a chemical solution of an isocyanate or an amine affects cross-linking and provides a harder surface and subsequent hardness gradient. Incorporation of peroxide or other free-radical initiator in the thermoplastic polymer, prior to molding or forming, also allows for heat curing on the molded core layer to create the desired hardness gradient. By proper selection of time/temperature, an annealing process can be used to create a gradient. Suitable annealing and/or peroxide (free radical) methods are such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,274,041 and 5,356,941, respectively, which are incorporated by reference herein. Additionally, silane or amino-silane crosslinking may also be employed as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,279,529, the disclosure of which incorporated herein by reference. The core layer may be chemically treated in a solution, such as a solution containing one or more isocyanates, to form the desired “positive hardness gradient.” The cores are typically exposed to the solution containing the isocyanate by immersing them in a bath at a particular temperature for a given time. Exposure time should be greater than 1 minute, preferably from 1 minute to 120 minutes, more preferably 5 minutes to 90 minutes, and most preferably 10 minutes to 60 minutes. In one preferred embodiment, the cores are immersed in the treating solution from 15 minutes to 45 minutes, more preferably from 20 minutes to 40 minutes, and most preferably from 25 minutes to 30 minutes.

The core layers may be chemically treated in a solution, such as a solution containing one or more isocyanates, to form the desired “positive hardness gradient.” The cores are typically exposed to the solution containing the isocyanate by immersing them in a bath at a particular temperature for a given time. Exposure time should be greater than 1 minute, preferably from 1 minute to 120 minutes, more preferably 5 minutes to 90 minutes, and most preferably 10 minutes to 60 minutes. In one preferred embodiment, the cores are immersed in the treating solution from 15 minutes to 45 minutes, more preferably from 20 minutes to 40 minutes, and most preferably from 25 minutes to 30 minutes. Both irradiative and chemical methods promote molecular bonding, or cross-links, within the TP polymer. Radiative methods permit cross-linking and grafting in situ on finished products and cross-linking occurs at lower temperatures with radiation than with chemical processing. Chemical methods depend on the particular polymer, the presence of modifying agents, and variables in processing, such as the level of irradiation. Significant property benefits in the thermoplastic materials can be attained and include, but are not limited to, improved thermomechanical properties; lower permeability and improved chemical resistance; reduced stress cracking; and overall improvement in physical toughness.

Additional embodiments involve the use of plasticizers to treat the core layers, thereby creating a softer outer portion of the core for a “negative” hardness gradient. The plasticizer may be reactive (such as higher alkyl acrylates) or non-reactive (that is, phthalates, dioctylphthalate, or stearamides, etc). Other suitable plasticizers include, but are not limited to, oxa acids, fatty amines, fatty amides, fatty acid esters, phthalates, adipates, and sebacates. Oxa acids are preferred plasticizers, more preferably those having at least one or two acid functional groups and a variety of different chain lengths. Preferred oxa acids include 3,6-dioxaheptanoic acid, 3,6,9-trioxadecanoic acid, diglycolic acid, 3,6,9-trioxaundecanoic acid, polyglycol diacid, and 3,6-dioxaoctanedioic acid, such as those commercially available from Archimica of Wilmington, Del. Any means of chemical degradation will also result in a “negative” hardness gradient. Chemical modifications such as esterification or saponification are also suitable for modification of the thermoplastic core layer surface and can result in the desired “positive hardness gradient.

Core Structure

As discussed above, the core of the golf ball of this invention preferably has a dual-layered structure comprising an inner core and outer core layer. Referring to FIG. 3, one version of a golf ball that can be made in accordance with this invention is generally indicated at (20). The ball (20) contains a dual-layered core (22) having an inner core (center) (22 a) and outer core layer (22 b) surrounded by a single-layered cover (24). The inner core (22 a) is relatively small in volume and generally has a diameter within a range of about 0.10 to about 1.10 inches. More particularly, the inner core (22 a) preferably has a diameter size with a lower limit of about 0.15 or 0.25 or 0.35 or 0.45 or 0.55 inches and an upper limit of about 0.60 or 0.70 or 0.80 or 0.90 inches. In one preferred version, the diameter of the inner core (22 a) is in the range of about 0.025 to about 0.080 inches, more preferably about 0.030 to about 0.075 inches. Meanwhile, the outer core layer (22 b) generally has a thickness within a range of about 0.010 to about 0.250 inches and preferably has a lower limit of 0.010 or 0.020 or 0.025 or 0.030 inches and an upper limit of 0.070 or 0.080 or 0.100 or 0.200 inches. In one preferred version, the outer core layer has a thickness in the range of about 0.040 to about 0.170 inches, more preferably about 0.060 to about 0.150 inches.

Referring to FIG. 4, in another version, the golf ball (25) contains a dual-core (26) having an inner core (center) (26 a) and outer core layer (26 b). The dual-core (26) is surrounded by a multi-layered cover (28) having an inner cover layer (28 a) and outer cover layer (28 b).

The hardness of the core sub-assembly (inner core and outer core layer) is an important property. In general, cores with relatively high hardness values have higher compression and tend to have good durability and resiliency. However, some high compression balls are stiff and this may have a detrimental effect on shot control and placement. Thus, the optimum balance of hardness in the core sub-assembly needs to be attained.

In one preferred golf ball, the inner core (center) has a “positive” hardness gradient (that is, the outer surface of the inner core is harder than its geometric center); and the outer core layer has a “positive” hardness gradient (that is, the outer surface of the outer core layer is harder than the inner surface of the outer core layer.) In such cases where both the inner core and outer core layer each has a “positive” hardness gradient, the outer surface hardness of the outer core layer is preferably greater than the hardness of the geometric center of the inner core. In one preferred version, the positive hardness gradient of the inner core is in the range of about 2 to about 40 Shore C units and even more preferably about 10 to about 25 Shore C units; while the positive hardness gradient of the outer core is in the range of about 2 to about 20 Shore C and even more preferably about 3 to about 10 Shore C.

In an alternative version, the inner core may have a positive hardness gradient; and the outer core layer may have a “zero” hardness gradient (that is, the hardness values of the outer surface of the outer core layer and the inner surface of the outer core layer are substantially the same) or a “negative” hardness gradient (that is, the outer surface of the outer core layer is softer than the inner surface of the outer core layer.) For example, in one version, the inner core has a positive hardness gradient; and the outer core layer has a negative hardness gradient in the range of about 2 to about 25 Shore C. In a second alternative version, the inner core may have a zero or negative hardness gradient; and the outer core layer may have a positive hardness gradient. Still yet, in another embodiment, both the inner core and outer core layers have zero or negative hardness gradients.

In general, hardness gradients are further described in Bulpett et al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,537,529 and 7,410,429, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Methods for measuring the hardness of the inner core and outer core layers along with other layers in the golf ball and determining the hardness gradients of the various layers are described in further detail below. The core layers have positive, negative, or zero hardness gradients defined by hardness measurements made at the outer surface of the inner core (or outer surface of the outer core layer) and radially inward towards the center of the inner core (or inner surface of the outer core layer). These measurements are made typically at 2-mm increments as described in the test methods below. In general, the hardness gradient is determined by subtracting the hardness value at the innermost portion of the component being measured (for example, the center of the inner core or inner surface of the outer core layer) from the hardness value at the outer surface of the component being measured (for example, the outer surface of the inner core or outer surface of the outer core layer).

Positive Hardness Gradient.

For example, if the hardness value of the outer surface of the inner core is greater than the hardness value of the inner core's geometric center (that is, the inner core has a surface harder than its geometric center), the hardness gradient will be deemed “positive” (a larger number minus a smaller number equals a positive number.) For example, if the outer surface of the inner core has a hardness of 67 Shore C and the geometric center of the inner core has a hardness of 60 Shore C, then the inner core has a positive hardness gradient of 7. Likewise, if the outer surface of the outer core layer has a greater hardness value than the inner surface of the outer core layer, the given outer core layer will be considered to have a positive hardness gradient.

Negative Hardness Gradient.

On the other hand, if the hardness value of the outer surface of the inner core is less than the hardness value of the inner core's geometric center (that is, the inner core has a surface softer than its geometric center), the hardness gradient will be deemed “negative.” For example, if the outer surface of the inner core has a hardness of 68 Shore C and the geometric center of the inner core has a hardness of 70 Shore C, then the inner core has a negative hardness gradient of 2. Likewise, if the outer surface of the outer core layer has a lesser hardness value than the inner surface of the outer core layer, the given outer core layer will be considered to have a negative hardness gradient.

Zero Hardness Gradient.

In another example, if the hardness value of the outer surface of the inner core is substantially the same as the hardness value of the inner core's geometric center (that is, the surface of the inner core has about the same hardness as the geometric center), the hardness gradient will be deemed “zero.” For example, if the outer surface of the inner core and the geometric center of the inner core each has a hardness of 65 Shore C, then the inner core has a zero hardness gradient. Likewise, if the outer surface of the outer core layer has a hardness value approximately the same as the inner surface of the outer core layer, the outer core layer will be considered to have a zero hardness gradient.

More particularly, the term, “positive hardness gradient” as used herein means a hardness gradient of positive 3 Shore C or greater, preferably 7 Shore C or greater, more preferably 10 Shore C, and even more preferably 20 Shore C or greater. The term, “zero hardness gradient” as used herein means a hardness gradient of less than 3 Shore C, preferably less than 1 Shore C and may have a value of zero or negative 1 to negative 10 Shore C. The term, “negative hardness gradient” as used herein means a hardness value of less than zero, for example, negative 3, negative 5, negative 7, negative 10, negative 15, or negative 20 or negative 25. The terms, “zero hardness gradient” and “negative hardness gradient” may be used herein interchangeably to refer to hardness gradients of negative 1 to negative 10.

The inner core preferably has a geometric center hardness (H_(inner core center)) of about 5 Shore D or greater. For example, the (H_(inner core center)) may be in the range of about 5 to about 88 Shore D and more particularly within a range having a lower limit of about 5 or 10 or 18 or 20 or 26 or 30 or 34 or 36 or 38 or 42 or 48 or 50 or 52 Shore D and an upper limit of about 54 or 56 or 58 or 60 or 62 or 64 or 68 or 70 or 74 or 76 or 80 or 82 or 84 or 88 Shore D. In another example, the center hardness of the inner core (H_(inner core center)), as measured in Shore C units, is preferably about 10 Shore C or greater; for example, the H_(inner core center) may have a lower limit of about 10 or 14 or 16 or 20 or 23 or 24 or 28 or 31 or 34 or 37 or 40 or 44 Shore C and an upper limit of about 46 or 48 or 50 or 51 or 53 or 55 or 58 or 61 or 62 or 65 or 68 or 71 or 74 or 76 or 78 or 79 or 80 or 84 or 90 Shore C. Concerning the outer surface hardness of the inner core (H_(inner core surface)), this hardness is preferably about 12 Shore D or greater; for example, the H_(inner core surface) may fall within a range having a lower limit of about 12 or 15 or 18 or 20 or 22 or 26 or 30 or 34 or 36 or 38 or 42 or 48 or 50 or 52 Shore D and an upper limit of about 54 or 56 or 58 or 60 or 62 or 70 or 72 or 75 or 78 or 80 or 82 or 84 or 86 or 90 Shore D. In one version, the outer surface hardness of the inner core (H_(inner core surface)), as measured in Shore C units, has a lower limit of about 13 or 15 or 18 or 20 or 22 or 24 or 27 or 28 or 30 or 32 or 34 or 38 or 44 or 47 or 48 Shore C and an upper limit of about 50 or 54 or 56 or 61 or 65 or 66 or 68 or 70 or 73 or 76 or 78 or 80 or 84 or 86 or 88 or 90 or 92 Shore C. In another version, the geometric center hardness (H_(inner core center)) is in the range of about 10 Shore C to about 50 Shore C; and the outer surface hardness of the inner core (H_(inner core surface)) is in the range of about 5 Shore C to about 50 Shore C.

On the other hand, the outer core layer preferably has an outer surface hardness (H_(outer surface of OC)) of about 40 Shore D or greater, and more preferably within a range having a lower limit of about 40 or 42 or 44 or 46 or 48 or 50 or 52 and an upper limit of about 54 or 56 or 58 or 60 or 62 or 64 or 70 or 74 or 78 or 80 or 82 or 85 or 87 or 88 or 90 Shore D. The outer surface hardness of the outer core layer (H_(outer surface of OC)), as measured in Shore C units, preferably has a lower limit of about 40 or 42 or 45 or 48 or 50 or 54 or 58 or 60 or 63 or 65 or 67 or 70 or 72 or 73 or 76 Shore C, and an upper limit of about 78 or 80 or 84 or 87 or 88 or 89 or 90 or 92 or 95 Shore C. And, the inner surface of the outer core layer (H_(inner surface of OC)) preferably has a hardness of about 40 Shore D or greater, and more preferably within a range having a lower limit of about 40 or 42 or 44 or 46 or 48 or 50 or 52 and an upper limit of about 54 or 56 or 58 or 60 or 62 or 64 or 70 or 74 or 78 or 80 or 82 or 85 or 87 or 88 or 90 Shore D. The inner surface hardness of the outer core layer (H_(inner surface of OC)), as measured in Shore C units, preferably has a lower limit of about 40 or 42 or 44 or 45 or 47 or 50 or 52 or 54 or 55 or 58 or 60 or 63 or 65 or 67 or 70 or 73 or 76 Shore C, and an upper limit of about 78 or 80 or 85 or 88 or 89 or 90 or 92 or 95 Shore C. When measured in Shore A units, the outer surface hardness of the outer core ((H_(outer surface of OC)) generally has a hardness of about 5 or greater, and preferably has a lower limit of 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, or 42 Shore A and an upper limit of about 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 80, 85, or 90 Shore A.

In one embodiment, the outer surface hardness of the outer core layer (H_(outer surface of OC)), is less than the outer surface hardness (H_(inner core surface)) of the inner core by at least 3 Shore C units and more preferably by at least 5 Shore C.

In a second embodiment, the outer surface hardness of the outer core layer (H_(outer surface of OC)), is greater than the outer surface hardness (H_(inner core surface)) of the inner core by at least 3 Shore C units and more preferably by at least 5 Shore C.

As discussed above, the inner core is preferably formed from a foamed thermoplastic or thermoset composition and more preferably foamed polyurethanes. And, the outer core layer is formed preferably from a non-foamed thermoset composition such as polybutadiene rubber.

The core structure also has a hardness gradient across the entire core assembly. In one embodiment, the (H_(inner core center)) is in the range of about 10 Shore C to about 60 Shore C, preferably about 13 Shore C to about 55 Shore C; and the (H_(outer surface of OC)) is in the range of about 65 to about 96 Shore C, preferably about 68 Shore C to about 94 Shore C or about 75 Shore C to about 93 Shore C, to provide a positive hardness gradient across the core assembly. The gradient across the core assembly will vary based on several factors including, but not limited to, the dimensions of the inner core, intermediate core, and outer core layers.

The inner core preferably has a diameter in the range of about 0.100 to about 1.100 inches. For example, the inner core may have a diameter within a range of about 0.100 to about 0.500 inches. In another example, the inner core may have a diameter within a range of about 0.300 to about 0.800 inches. More particularly, the inner core may have a diameter size with a lower limit of about 0.10 or 0.12 or 0.15 or 0.25 or 0.30 or 0.35 or 0.45 or 0.55 inches and an upper limit of about 0.60 or 0.65 or 0.70 or 0.80 or 0.90 or 1.00 or 1.10 inches. As far as the outer core layer is concerned, it preferably has a thickness in the range of about 0.100 to about 0.750 inches. For example, the lower limit of thickness may be about 0.050 or 0.100 or 0.150 or 0.200 or 0.250 or 0.300 or 0.340 or 0.400 and the upper limit may be about 0.500 or 0.550 or 0.600 or 0.650 or 0.700 or 0.750 inches.

Dual-layered core structures containing layers with various thickness and volume levels may be made in accordance with this invention. For example, in one version, the total diameter of the core structure is 0.20 inches and the total volume of the core structure is 0.23 cc. More particularly, in this example, the diameter of the inner core is 0.10 inches and the volume of the inner core is 0.10 cc; while the thickness of the outer core is 0.100 inches and the volume of the outer core is 0.13 cc. In another version, the total core diameter is about 1.55 inches and the total core volume is 31.96 cc. In this version, the outer core layer has a thickness of 0.400 inches and volume of 28.34 cc. Meanwhile, the inner core has a diameter of 0.75 inches and volume of 3.62 cm. In one embodiment, the volume of the outer core layer is greater than the volume of the inner core. In another embodiment, the volume of the outer core layer and inner core are equivalent. In still another embodiment, the volume of the outer core layer is less than the volume of the inner core. Other examples of core structures containing layers of varying thicknesses and volumes are described below in Table A.

TABLE A Sample Core Dimensions Thermoset Foamed Total Outer Inner Volume Ex- Core Total Core Outer Core of am- Diam- Core Thick- Core Diam- Inner ple eter Volume ness Volume eter Core A 0.30″  0.23 cc 0.100″  0.13 cc 0.10″ 0.10 cc B 1.60″ 33.15 cc 0.750″ 33.05 cc 0.10″ 0.10 cc C 1.55″ 31.96 cc 0.225″ 11.42 cc 1.10″ 11.42 cc  D 1.55″ 31.96 cc 0.400″ 28.34 cc 0.75″ 3.62 cc E 1.55″ 31.96 cc 0.525″ 28.34 cc 0.50″ 3.62 cc

In one preferred embodiment, the inner core has a specific gravity in the range of about 0.25 to about 1.25 g/cc. Also, as discussed above, the specific gravity of the inner core may vary at different points of the inner core structure. That is, there may be a specific gravity gradient in the inner core. For example, in one preferred version, the geometric center of the inner core has a density in the range of about 0.25 to about 0.75 g/cc; while the outer skin of the inner core has a density in the range of about 0.75 to about 1.50 g/cc.

Meanwhile, the outer core layer preferably has a relatively high specific gravity. Thus, the specific gravity of the inner core layer (SG_(inner)) is preferably less than the specific gravity of the outer core layer (SG_(outer)). By the term, “specific gravity of the outer core layer” (“SG_(outer)”), it is generally meant the specific gravity of the outer core layer as measured at any point of the outer core layer. The specific gravity values at different points in the outer core layer may vary. That is, there may be specific gravity gradients in the outer core layer similar to the inner core. For example, the outer core layer may have a specific gravity within a range having a lower limit of about 0.50 or 0.60 or 0.70 or 0.75 or 0.85 or 0.95 or 1.00 or 1.10 or 1.25 or 1.30 or 1.36 or 1.40 or 1.42 or 1.48 or 1.50 or 1.60 or 1.66 or 1.75 or 2.00 and an upper limit of 2.50 or 2.60 or 2.80 or 2.90 or 3.00 or 3.10 or 3.25 or 3.50 or 3.60 or 3.80 or 4.00, 4.25 or 5.00 or 5.10 or 5.20 or 5.30 or 5.40 or 6.00 or 6.20 or 6.25 or 6.30 or 6.40 or 6.50 or 7.00 or 7.10 or 7.25 or 7.50 or 7.60 or 7.65 or 7.80 or 8.00 or 8.20 or 8.50 or 9.00 or 9.75 or 10.00 g/cc.

In general, the specific gravities of the respective pieces of an object affect the Moment of Inertia (MOI) of the object. The Moment of Inertia of a ball (or other object) about a given axis generally refers to how difficult it is to change the ball's angular motion about that axis. If the ball's mass is concentrated towards the center (the center piece (for example, inner core) has a higher specific gravity than the outer piece (for example, outer core layers), less force is required to change its rotational rate, and the ball has a relatively low Moment of Inertia. In such balls, most of the mass is located close to the ball's axis of rotation and less force is needed to generate spin. Thus, the ball has a generally high spin rate as the ball leaves the club's face after making impact. Conversely, if the ball's mass is concentrated towards the outer surface (the outer piece (for example, outer core layers) has a higher specific gravity than the center piece (for example, inner core), more force is required to change its rotational rate, and the ball has a relatively high Moment of Inertia. That is, in such balls, most of the mass is located away from the ball's axis of rotation and more force is needed to generate spin. Such balls have a generally low spin rate as the ball leaves the club's face after making impact.

More particularly, as described in Sullivan, U.S. Pat. No. 6,494,795 and Ladd et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,651,415, the formula for the Moment of Inertia for a sphere through any diameter is given in the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 24th Edition, 1976 at 20 (hereinafter CRC reference). The term, “specific gravity” as used herein, has its ordinary and customary meaning, that is, the ratio of the density of a substance to the density of water at 4° C., and the density of water at this temperature is 1 g/cm³.

In one embodiment, the golf balls of this invention are relatively low spin and long distance. That is, the foam core construction, as described above, wherein the inner core is made of a foamed composition helps provide a relatively low spin ball having good resiliency. The inner foam cores of this invention preferably have a Coefficient of Restitution (COR) of about 0.300 or greater; more preferably about 0.400 or greater, and even more preferably about 0.450 or greater. The resulting balls containing the dual-layered core constructions of this invention and cover of at least one layer preferably have a COR of about 0.700 or greater, more preferably about 0.730 or greater; and even more preferably about 0.750 to 0.810 or greater. The inner foam cores preferably have a Soft Center Deflection Index (“SCDI”) compression, as described in the Test Methods below, in the range of about 50 to about 190, and more preferably in the range of about 60 to about 170.

The USGA has established a maximum weight of 45.93 g (1.62 ounces) for golf balls. For play outside of USGA rules, the golf balls can be heavier. In one preferred embodiment, the weight of the multi-layered core is in the range of about 28 to about 38 grams. Also, golf balls made in accordance with this invention can be of any size, although the USGA requires that golf balls used in competition have a diameter of at least 1.68 inches. For play outside of United States Golf Association (USGA) rules, the golf balls can be of a smaller size. Normally, golf balls are manufactured in accordance with USGA requirements and have a diameter in the range of about 1.68 to about 1.80 inches. As discussed further below, the golf ball contains a cover which may be multi-layered and in addition may contain intermediate (casing) layers, and the thickness levels of these layers also must be considered. Thus, in general, the dual-layer core structure normally has an overall diameter within a range having a lower limit of about 1.00 or 1.20 or 1.30 or 1.40 inches and an upper limit of about 1.58 or 1.60 or 1.62 or 1.66 inches, and more preferably in the range of about 1.3 to 1.65 inches. In one embodiment, the diameter of the core sub-assembly is in the range of about 1.45 to about 1.62 inches.

Cover Structure

The golf ball sub-assemblies of this invention may be enclosed with one or more cover layers. The golf ball sub-assembly may comprise the multi-layered core structure as discussed above. In other versions, the golf ball sub-assembly includes the core structure and one or more casing (mantle) layers disposed about the core. In one particularly preferred version, the golf ball includes a multi-layered cover comprising inner and outer cover layers. The inner cover layer is preferably formed from a composition comprising an ionomer or a blend of two or more ionomers that helps impart hardness to the ball. In a particular embodiment, the inner cover layer is formed from a composition comprising a high acid ionomer. A particularly suitable high acid ionomer is Surlyn 8150® (DuPont). Surlyn 8150® is a copolymer of ethylene and methacrylic acid, having an acid content of 19 wt %, which is 45% neutralized with sodium. In another particular embodiment, the inner cover layer is formed from a composition comprising a high acid ionomer and a maleic anhydride-grafted non-ionomeric polymer. A particularly suitable maleic anhydride-grafted polymer is Fusabond 525D® (DuPont). Fusabond 525D® is a maleic anhydride-grafted, metallocene-catalyzed ethylene-butene copolymer having about 0.9 wt % maleic anhydride grafted onto the copolymer. A particularly preferred blend of high acid ionomer and maleic anhydride-grafted polymer is an 84 wt %/16 wt % blend of Surlyn 8150® and Fusabond 525D®. Blends of high acid ionomers with maleic anhydride-grafted polymers are further disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,992,135 and 6,677,401, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.

The inner cover layer also may be formed from a composition comprising a 50/45/5 blend of Surlyn® 8940/Surlyn® 9650/Nucrel® 960, and, in a particularly preferred embodiment, the composition has a material hardness of from 80 to 85 Shore C. In yet another version, the inner cover layer is formed from a composition comprising a 50/25/25 blend of Surlyn® 8940/Surlyn® 9650/Surlyn® 9910, preferably having a material hardness of about 90 Shore C. The inner cover layer also may be formed from a composition comprising a 50/50 blend of Surlyn® 8940/Surlyn® 9650, preferably having a material hardness of about 86 Shore C. A composition comprising a 50/50 blend of Surlyn® 8940 and Surlyn® 7940 also may be used. Surlyn® 8940 is an E/MAA copolymer in which the MAA acid groups have been partially neutralized with sodium ions. Surlyn® 9650 and Surlyn® 9910 are two different grades of E/MAA copolymer in which the MAA acid groups have been partially neutralized with zinc ions. Nucrel® 960 is an E/MAA copolymer resin nominally made with 15 wt % methacrylic acid.

A wide variety of materials may be used for forming the outer cover including, for example, polyurethanes; polyureas; copolymers, blends and hybrids of polyurethane and polyurea; olefin-based copolymer ionomer resins (for example, Surlyn® ionomer resins and DuPont HPF® 1000 and HPF® 2000, commercially available from DuPont; Iotek® ionomers, commercially available from ExxonMobil Chemical Company; Amplify® 10 ionomers of ethylene acrylic acid copolymers, commercially available from The Dow Chemical Company; and Clarix® ionomer resins, commercially available from A. Schulman Inc.); polyethylene, including, for example, low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, and high density polyethylene; polypropylene; rubber-toughened olefin polymers; acid copolymers, for example, poly(meth)acrylic acid, which do not become part of an ionomeric copolymer; plastomers; flexomers; styrene/butadiene/styrene block copolymers; styrene/ethylene-butylene/styrene block copolymers; dynamically vulcanized elastomers; copolymers of ethylene and vinyl acetates; copolymers of ethylene and methyl acrylates; polyvinyl chloride resins; polyamides, poly(amide-ester) elastomers, and graft copolymers of ionomer and polyamide including, for example, Pebax® thermoplastic polyether block amides, commercially available from Arkema Inc; cross-linked trans-polyisoprene and blends thereof; polyester-based thermoplastic elastomers, such as Hytrel®, commercially available from DuPont or RiteFlex®, commercially available from Ticona Engineering Polymers; polyurethane-based thermoplastic elastomers, such as Elastollan®, commercially available from BASF; synthetic or natural vulcanized rubber; and combinations thereof. Castable polyurethanes, polyureas, and hybrids of polyurethanes-polyureas are particularly desirable because these materials can be used to make a golf ball having high resiliency and a soft feel. By the term, “hybrids of polyurethane and polyurea,” it is meant to include copolymers and blends thereof.

Polyurethanes, polyureas, and blends, copolymers, and hybrids of polyurethane/polyurea are also particularly suitable for forming cover layers. When used as cover layer materials, polyurethanes and polyureas can be thermoset or thermoplastic. Thermoset materials can be formed into golf ball layers by conventional casting or reaction injection molding techniques. Thermoplastic materials can be formed into golf ball layers by conventional compression or injection molding techniques.

The compositions used to make the casing (mantle) and cover layers may contain a wide variety of fillers and additives to impart specific properties to the ball. For example, relatively heavy-weight and light-weight metal fillers such as, particulate; powders; flakes; and fibers of copper, steel, brass, tungsten, titanium, aluminum, magnesium, molybdenum, cobalt, nickel, iron, lead, tin, zinc, barium, bismuth, bronze, silver, gold, and platinum, and alloys and combinations thereof may be used to adjust the specific gravity of the ball. Other additives and fillers include, but are not limited to, optical brighteners, coloring agents, fluorescent agents, whitening agents, UV absorbers, light stabilizers, surfactants, processing aids, antioxidants, stabilizers, softening agents, fragrance components, plasticizers, impact modifiers, titanium dioxide, clay, mica, talc, glass flakes, milled glass, and mixtures thereof.

The inner cover layer preferably has a material hardness within a range having a lower limit of 70 or 75 or 80 or 82 Shore C and an upper limit of 85 or 86 or 90 or 92 Shore C. The thickness of the intermediate layer is preferably within a range having a lower limit of 0.010 or 0.015 or 0.020 or 0.030 inches and an upper limit of 0.035 or 0.045 or 0.080 or 0.120 inches. The outer cover layer preferably has a material hardness of 85 Shore C or less. The thickness of the outer cover layer is preferably within a range having a lower limit of 0.010 or 0.015 or 0.025 inches and an upper limit of 0.035 or 0.040 or 0.055 or 0.080 inches. Methods for measuring hardness of the layers in the golf ball are described in further detail below.

A single cover or, preferably, an inner cover layer is formed around the outer core layer. When an inner cover layer is present, an outer cover layer is formed over the inner cover layer. Most preferably, the inner cover is formed from an ionomeric material and the outer cover layer is formed from a polyurethane material, and the outer cover layer has a hardness that is less than that of the inner cover layer. Preferably, the inner cover has a hardness of greater than about 60 Shore D and the outer cover layer has a hardness of less than about 60 Shore D. In an alternative embodiment, the inner cover layer is comprised of a partially or fully neutralized ionomer, a thermoplastic polyester elastomer such as Hytrel™, commercially available form DuPont, a thermoplastic polyether block amide, such as Pebax™, commercially available from Arkema, Inc., or a thermoplastic or thermosetting polyurethane or polyurea, and the outer cover layer is comprised of an ionomeric material. In this alternative embodiment, the inner cover layer has a hardness of less than about 60 Shore D and the outer cover layer has a hardness of greater than about 55 Shore D and the inner cover layer hardness is less than the outer cover layer hardness.

As discussed above, the core structure of this invention may be enclosed with one or more cover layers. In one embodiment, a multi-layered cover comprising inner and outer cover layers is formed, where the inner cover layer has a thickness of about 0.01 inches to about 0.06 inches, more preferably about 0.015 inches to about 0.040 inches, and most preferably about 0.02 inches to about 0.035 inches. In this version, the inner cover layer is formed from a partially- or fully-neutralized ionomer having a Shore D hardness of greater than about 55, more preferably greater than about 60, and most preferably greater than about 65. The outer cover layer, in this embodiment, preferably has a thickness of about 0.015 inches to about 0.055 inches, more preferably about 0.02 inches to about 0.04 inches, and most preferably about 0.025 inches to about 0.035 inches, with a hardness of about Shore D 80 or less, more preferably 70 or less, and most preferably about 60 or less. The inner cover layer is harder than the outer cover layer in this version. A preferred outer cover layer is a castable or reaction injection molded polyurethane, polyurea or copolymer, blend, or hybrid thereof having a Shore D hardness of about 40 to about 50. In another multi-layer cover, dual-core embodiment, the outer cover and inner cover layer materials and thickness are the same but, the hardness range is reversed, that is, the outer cover layer is harder than the inner cover layer. For this harder outer cover/softer inner cover embodiment, the ionomer resins described above would preferably be used as outer cover material.

Manufacturing of Golf Balls

As described above, the inner core preferably is formed by a casting method. The outer core layer, which surrounds the inner core, is formed by molding compositions over the inner core. Compression or injection molding techniques may be used to form the other layers of the core sub-assembly. Then, the casing and/or cover layers are applied over the core sub-assembly. Prior to this step, the core structure may be surface-treated to increase the adhesion between its outer surface and the next layer that will be applied over the core. Such surface-treatment may include mechanically or chemically-abrading the outer surface of the core. For example, the core may be subjected to corona-discharge, plasma-treatment, silane-dipping, or other treatment methods known to those in the art.

The cover layers are formed over the core or ball sub-assembly (the core structure and any casing layers disposed about the core) using a suitable technique such as, for example, compression-molding, flip-molding, injection-molding, retractable pin injection-molding, reaction injection-molding (RIM), liquid injection-molding, casting, spraying, powder-coating, vacuum-forming, flow-coating, dipping, spin-coating, and the like. Preferably, each cover layer is separately formed over the ball subassembly. For example, an ethylene acid copolymer ionomer composition may be injection-molded to produce half-shells. Alternatively, the ionomer composition can be placed into a compression mold and molded under sufficient pressure, temperature, and time to produce the hemispherical shells. The smooth-surfaced hemispherical shells are then placed around the core sub-assembly in a compression mold. Under sufficient heating and pressure, the shells fuse together to form an inner cover layer that surrounds the sub-assembly. In another method, the ionomer composition is injection-molded directly onto the core sub-assembly using retractable pin injection molding. An outer cover layer comprising a polyurethane or polyurea composition over the ball sub-assembly may be formed by using a casting process.

After the golf balls have been removed from the mold, they may be subjected to finishing steps such as flash-trimming, surface-treatment, marking, coating, and the like using techniques known in the art. For example, in traditional white-colored golf balls, the white-pigmented cover may be surface-treated using a suitable method such as, for example, corona, plasma, or ultraviolet (UV) light-treatment. Then, indicia such as trademarks, symbols, logos, letters, and the like may be printed on the ball's cover using pad-printing, ink-jet printing, dye-sublimation, or other suitable printing methods. Clear surface coatings (for example, primer and top-coats), which may contain a fluorescent whitening agent, are applied to the cover. The resulting golf ball has a glossy and durable surface finish.

In another finishing process, the golf balls are painted with one or more paint coatings. For example, white primer paint may be applied first to the surface of the ball and then a white top-coat of paint may be applied over the primer. Of course, the golf ball may be painted with other colors, for example, red, blue, orange, and yellow. As noted above, markings such as trademarks and logos may be applied to the painted cover of the golf ball. Finally, a clear surface coating may be applied to the cover to provide a shiny appearance and protect any logos and other markings printed on the ball.

Different ball constructions can be made using the core construction of this invention as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. Such golf ball constructions include, for example, five-piece, and six-piece constructions. It should be understood that the golf balls shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 are for illustrative purposes only, and they are not meant to be restrictive. Other golf ball constructions can be made in accordance with this invention.

Cores Having Three Layers

For example, multi-layered cores having an inner core, intermediate core layer, and outer core layer, wherein the intermediate core layer is disposed between the intermediate and outer core layers may be prepared in accordance with this invention. More particularly, as discussed above, the inner core may be constructed from a foamed composition, preferably foamed polyurethane. Meanwhile, the intermediate and outer core layers may be formed from non-foamed thermoset or thermoplastic materials. Suitable thermoset and thermoplastic compositions that may be used to form the intermediate/outer core layers are discussed above. For example, each of the intermediate and outer core layers may be formed from a thermoset rubber composition. Thus, the intermediate core layer may be formed from a first thermoset rubber composition; and the outer core layer may be formed from a second thermoset rubber composition. In another embodiment, the intermediate core layer is formed from a non-foamed thermoset composition; and the outer core layer is formed from a non-foamed thermoplastic composition. In a third embodiment, the intermediate core layer is formed from a non-foamed thermoplastic composition; and the outer core layer is formed from a non-foamed thermoset composition. Finally, in a fourth embodiment, the intermediate core layer is formed from a first non-foamed thermoplastic composition; and the outer core layer is formed from a second non-foamed thermoplastic compositions.

The above-discussed thermoset and thermoplastic compositions may be used to form the intermediate and outer core layers. In one embodiment, the specific gravity of the inner core (foamed composition) is less than the specific gravity of the intermediate and outer core layers. The specific gravities of the intermediate and outer core layers may be the same or different. In one version, the specific gravity of the intermediate core layer is greater than the specific gravity of the outer core layer. In another version, the specific gravity of the outer core is greater than the specific gravity of the intermediate core layer.

Cores Having Two or More Foam Layers

In another example, cores having two or more layers comprising foamed compositions may be made in accordance with this invention. In one embodiment, a dual-core structure having an inner core layer comprising a first foamed silicone composition, and an outer core layer comprising a second foamed silicone composition is made. The inner core layer preferably has a diameter in the range of about 0.100 to about 1.100 inches and the outer core layer preferably has a thickness in the range of about 0.100 to about 0.750 inches. The specific gravity of the outer core (SG_(outer)) is preferably greater than the specific gravity of the inner core (SG_(inner)). Alternatively, the inner core may have a greater specific gravity than the outer core's specific gravity. In yet another version, the specific gravities of the inner and outer core layers are substantially equivalent. Furthermore, the inner cover layer, which surrounds the core sub-assembly, may be foamed or non-foamed. Suitable thermoset and thermoplastic compositions that may be used to form the foam compositions for constructing the different core and cover layers are discussed above. For example, in another embodiment, a dual-core structure having an inner core layer comprising a first foamed silicone composition, and an outer core layer comprising a foamed polyurethane composition is made. Thus, the silicone foam composition of this invention is preferably used to manufacture the inner core layer (center), but it also may be used to make intermediate and outer core layers in accordance with this invention. It also is recognized that the silicone foam composition may be used to manufacture non-core layers in the golf ball including, but not limited to, the intermediate (casing) layers and inner and outer cover layers.

Where more than one foam layer is used in a single golf ball, the respective foamed chemical compositions may be the same or different, and the compositions may have the same or different hardness or specific gravity levels. For example, a golf ball may contain a dual-core having a foamed silicone center with a specific gravity of about 0.40 g/cc and a geometric center hardness of about 50 Shore C and a center surface hardness of about 75 Shore C. Meanwhile, the outer core layer may be made from a foamed highly-neutralized ionomer (HNP) composition, wherein the outer core layer has a specific gravity of about 0.80 g/cc and a surface hardness of about 80 Shore C.

In another example, a golf ball having a foamed center made of a foamed silicone composition and a surrounding outer core layer made of a foamed highly-neutralized ionomer (HNP) may be made. In one embodiment, the foamed center has a specific gravity of about 0.40 g/cc, and the foamed outer core layer has a specific gravity of about 0.80 g/cc. In a third example, a silicone foam center (0.50 inch diameter) is encased in a HNP foam outer core layer (0.06 inch thickness). The inner foamed silicone core has a specific gravity of 0.5 g/cc and a surface hardness of 80 Shore C, while the outer foamed HNP core has a specific gravity of 0.90 g/cc and a surface hardness of 70 Shore C. The dual-core is enclosed in a dual-cover, wherein the inner cover is made of a relatively hard ionomer composition (for example, a 50/50 blend of Surlyn® 7940 and Surlyn® 8940 or a 50/50 blend of Surlyn® 9910/Surlyn® 8940) preferably having a thickness of 0.06 inches and an outer cover made of a relatively soft polyurethane composition preferably having a thickness of 0.03 inches.

In a fourth example, a rigid foam outer core layer comprising a thermoset polyurethane foam composition is molded over an inner core (center) comprising a HNP foam composition to provide a “hard over soft” dual-core that reduces ball spin and increases ball distance. In this example, the HNP foam center has a diameter of about 0.50 to about 0.80 inches, and the outer core layer of cast, thermoset foam has an outer diameter of about 1.30 to about 1.58 inches. The dual-core is enclosed in a dual-cover, wherein the inner cover is made of a relatively hard ionomer composition (for example, a 50/50 blend of Surlyn® 7940 and Surlyn® 8940 or a 50/50 blend of Surlyn® 9910/Surlyn® 8940) preferably having a thickness of 0.06 inches and an outer cover made of a relatively soft polyurethane composition preferably having a thickness of 0.03 inches. In this embodiment, either the inner cover comprising the ionomer blend or the outer cover comprising the polyurethane preferably contains a sufficient amount of heavy filler to adjust the weight of the golf ball so that it is at least 44 grams, preferably 45.0 to 45.9 grams. In an alternative embodiment, a relatively soft polyurethane foam composition is used to form the inner core (center) as opposed to the foamed HNP composition. The soft polyurethane foam material used to form the inner core preferably has a different chemical composition than the soft polyurethane material used to form the outer cover.

Furthermore, multi-layered cores having an inner core, intermediate core layer, and outer core layer (as discussed above) may be made, wherein at least two of the layers comprise foamed compositions. The core may have adjoining foam layers, for example, the inner core and intermediate core layers may be made of foamed silicone compositions, while the outer core layer may be made of a non-foamed thermoset or thermoplastic composition. For example, a polybutadiene foamed center (0.50 inch diameter) is encased in a partially-neutralized ionomer foamed intermediate core layer (0.050 inch thickness). The inner foamed polybutadiene core may have a specific gravity of 0.85 g/cc and a surface hardness of 65 Shore C, while the partially-neutralized ionomer foamed intermediate core layer may have a specific gravity of 0.70 g/cc and a surface hardness of 85 Shore C. An outer core layer made of a relative hard HNP ionomer composition having a specific gravity of 0.70 g/cc and a surface hardness of 85 Shore C surrounds the intermediate core layer. The three-layered core structure (“triple core”) is enclosed in a dual-cover, wherein the inner cover is made of a relatively hard ionomer composition and an outer cover made of a relatively soft polyurethane composition.

In an alternative version, the core may have a non-foamed thermoset or thermoplastic layer disposed between two foam layers. For example, the inner and outer core layers may be made of a foamed silicone composition, and these layers may form a sandwich around an intermediate core layer made of a non-foamed thermoset or thermoplastic composition such as polybutadiene rubber.

Test Methods

Hardness.

The center hardness of a core is obtained according to the following procedure. The core is gently pressed into a hemispherical holder having an internal diameter approximately slightly smaller than the diameter of the core, such that the core is held in place in the hemispherical portion of the holder while concurrently leaving the geometric central plane of the core exposed. The core is secured in the holder by friction, such that it will not move during the cutting and grinding steps, but the friction is not so excessive that distortion of the natural shape of the core would result. The core is secured such that the parting line of the core is roughly parallel to the top of the holder. The diameter of the core is measured 90 degrees to this orientation prior to securing. A measurement is also made from the bottom of the holder to the top of the core to provide a reference point for future calculations. A rough cut is made slightly above the exposed geometric center of the core using a band saw or other appropriate cutting tool, making sure that the core does not move in the holder during this step. The remainder of the core, still in the holder, is secured to the base plate of a surface grinding machine. The exposed ‘rough’ surface is ground to a smooth, flat surface, revealing the geometric center of the core, which can be verified by measuring the height from the bottom of the holder to the exposed surface of the core, making sure that exactly half of the original height of the core, as measured above, has been removed to within 0.004 inches. Leaving the core in the holder, the center of the core is found with a center square and carefully marked and the hardness is measured at the center mark according to ASTM D-2240. Additional hardness measurements at any distance from the center of the core can then be made by drawing a line radially outward from the center mark, and measuring the hardness at any given distance along the line, typically in 2 mm increments from the center. The hardness at a particular distance from the center should be measured along at least two, preferably four, radial arms located 180° apart, or 90° apart, respectively, and then averaged. All hardness measurements performed on a plane passing through the geometric center are performed while the core is still in the holder and without having disturbed its orientation, such that the test surface is constantly parallel to the bottom of the holder, and thus also parallel to the properly aligned foot of the durometer.

The outer surface hardness of a golf ball layer is measured on the actual outer surface of the layer and is obtained from the average of a number of measurements taken from opposing hemispheres, taking care to avoid making measurements on the parting line of the core or on surface defects, such as holes or protrusions. Hardness measurements are made pursuant to ASTM D-2240 “Indentation Hardness of Rubber and Plastic by Means of a Durometer.” Because of the curved surface, care must be taken to ensure that the golf ball or golf ball sub-assembly is centered under the durometer indenter before a surface hardness reading is obtained. A calibrated, digital durometer, capable of reading to 0.1 hardness units is used for the hardness measurements. The digital durometer must be attached to, and its foot made parallel to, the base of an automatic stand. The weight on the durometer and attack rate conforms to ASTM D-2240.

In certain embodiments, a point or plurality of points measured along the “positive” or “negative” gradients may be above or below a line fit through the gradient and its outermost and innermost hardness values. In an alternative preferred embodiment, the hardest point along a particular steep “positive” or “negative” gradient may be higher than the value at the innermost portion of the inner core (the geometric center) or outer core layer (the inner surface)—as long as the outermost point (i.e., the outer surface of the inner core) is greater than (for “positive”) or lower than (for “negative”) the innermost point (i.e., the geometric center of the inner core or the inner surface of the outer core layer), such that the “positive” and “negative” gradients remain intact.

As discussed above, the direction of the hardness gradient of a golf ball layer is defined by the difference in hardness measurements taken at the outer and inner surfaces of a particular layer. The center hardness of an inner core and hardness of the outer surface of an inner core in a single-core ball or outer core layer are readily determined according to the test procedures provided above. The outer surface of the inner core layer (or other optional intermediate core layers) in a dual-core ball are also readily determined according to the procedures given herein for measuring the outer surface hardness of a golf ball layer, if the measurement is made prior to surrounding the layer with an additional core layer. Once an additional core layer surrounds a layer of interest, the hardness of the inner and outer surfaces of any inner or intermediate layers can be difficult to determine. Therefore, for purposes of the present invention, when the hardness of the inner or outer surface of a core layer is needed after the inner layer has been surrounded with another core layer, the test procedure described above for measuring a point located 1 mm from an interface is used.

Also, it should be understood that there is a fundamental difference between “material hardness” and “hardness as measured directly on a golf ball.” For purposes of the present invention, material hardness is measured according to ASTM D2240 and generally involves measuring the hardness of a flat “slab” or “button” formed of the material. Surface hardness as measured directly on a golf ball (or other spherical surface) typically results in a different hardness value. The difference in “surface hardness” and “material hardness” values is due to several factors including, but not limited to, ball construction (that is, core type, number of cores and/or cover layers, and the like); ball (or sphere) diameter; and the material composition of adjacent layers. It also should be understood that the two measurement techniques are not linearly related and, therefore, one hardness value cannot easily be correlated to the other. Shore hardness (for example, Shore C or Shore D or Shore A hardness) was measured according to the test method ASTM D-2240.

Compression.

As disclosed in Jeff Dalton's Compression by Any Other Name, Science and Golf IV, Proceedings of the World Scientific Congress of Golf (Eric Thain ed., Routledge, 2002) (“J. Dalton”), several different methods can be used to measure compression, including Atti compression, Riehle compression, load/deflection measurements at a variety of fixed loads and offsets, and effective modulus. For purposes of the present invention, compression refers to Soft Center Deflection Index (“SCDI”). The SCDI is a program change for the Dynamic Compression Machine (“DCM”) that allows determination of the pounds required to deflect a core 10% of its diameter. The DCM is an apparatus that applies a load to a core or ball and measures the number of inches the core or ball is deflected at measured loads. A crude load/deflection curve is generated that is fit to the Atti compression scale that results in a number being generated that represents an Atti compression. The DCM does this via a load cell attached to the bottom of a hydraulic cylinder that is triggered pneumatically at a fixed rate (typically about 1.0 ft/s) towards a stationary core. Attached to the cylinder is an LVDT that measures the distance the cylinder travels during the testing timeframe. A software-based logarithmic algorithm ensures that measurements are not taken until at least five successive increases in load are detected during the initial phase of the test. The SCDI is a slight variation of this set up. The hardware is the same, but the software and output has changed. With the SCDI, the interest is in the pounds of force required to deflect a core x amount of inches. That amount of deflection is 10% percent of the core diameter. The DCM is triggered, the cylinder deflects the core by 10% of its diameter, and the DCM reports back the pounds of force required (as measured from the attached load cell) to deflect the core by that amount. The value displayed is a single number in units of pounds.

Coefficient of Restitution (“COR”).

The COR is determined according to a known procedure, wherein a golf ball or golf ball sub-assembly (for example, a golf ball core) is fired from an air cannon at two given velocities and a velocity of 125 ft/s is used for the calculations. Ballistic light screens are located between the air cannon and steel plate at a fixed distance to measure ball velocity. As the ball travels toward the steel plate, it activates each light screen and the ball's time period at each light screen is measured. This provides an incoming transit time period which is inversely proportional to the ball's incoming velocity. The ball makes impact with the steel plate and rebounds so it passes again through the light screens. As the rebounding ball activates each light screen, the ball's time period at each screen is measured. This provides an outgoing transit time period which is inversely proportional to the ball's outgoing velocity. The COR is then calculated as the ratio of the ball's outgoing transit time period to the ball's incoming transit time period (COR=V_(out)/V_(in)=T_(in)/T_(out)).

Density.

The density refers to the weight per unit volume (typically, g/cm³) of the material and can be measured per ASTM D-1622.

It is understood that the golf ball compositions, constructions, and products described and illustrated herein represent only some embodiments of the invention. It is appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and additions can be made to compositions, constructions, and products without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. It is intended that all such embodiments be covered by the appended claims. 

We claim:
 1. A golf ball, comprising: i) an inner core layer comprising a foamed silicone rubber composition, the inner core layer having a diameter in the range of about 0.100 to about 1.100 inches and a specific gravity (SG_(inner)), wherein the inner core layer has an outer surface hardness (H_(inner core surface)) and a center hardness (H_(inner core center)) and the H_(inner core surface) is in the range of about 24 Shore C to about 52 Shore C and the H_(inner core center) is in the range of about 20 Shore C to about 48 Shore C to provide a positive hardness gradient; and ii) an outer core layer comprising a foamed silicone rubber composition, the outer core layer being disposed about the inner core layer and having a thickness in the range of about 0.100 to about 0.750 inches, and a specific gravity (SG_(outer)), wherein the outer core layer has an outer surface hardness (H_(outer surface of OC)) and an inner surface hardness (H_(inner surface of OC)) and the H_(outer surface of OC) is in the range of about 72 Shore C to about 95 Shore C and the H_(inner surface of OC) is in the range of about 40 Shore C to about 87 Shore C to provide a positive hardness gradient and the SG_(outer), is greater than the SG_(inner).
 2. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the inner core layer has a diameter in the range of about 0.100 to about 0.900 inches and a specific gravity in the range of about 0.25 to about 1.25 g/cc.
 3. The golf ball of claim 1, wherein the outer core layer has a thickness in the range of about 0.250 to about 0.750 inches and a specific gravity in the range of about 0.60 to about 2.90 g/cc.
 4. The golf ball of claim 1, further comprising a cover having at least one layer.
 5. The golf ball of claim 4, wherein the cover layer comprises two layers. 